Migration Amendment (2026 Measures No. 1) Bill 2026; Consideration in Detail

Ryan moved amendments to strengthen the test for arrival control determinations, requiring a reasonable probability that suspension was necessary. Ryan criticised the lack of parliamentary scrutiny, the absence of a sunset clause, and the potential for indefinite visa suspensions, particularly affecting Iranians holding visitor visas.

Watson-Brown argued that the bill was hypocritical, as Australia was contributing to the conflict in Iran while blocking entry to those stranded by it. Watson-Brown contended that the legislation denied access to vetted visa holders and that the costs of war were being borne by working people and refugees rather than politicians or corporations.

Boele moved an amendment requiring the government to issue additional humanitarian visas equal to the number of temporary visas suspended under the bill. Boele cited Australia's history of accepting refugees and argued that if the government blocked entry, it should compensate by increasing humanitarian intake, rather than relying on rushed legislation.

Steggall moved amendments to limit the definition of triggering events to armed conflict, ensure Australia had not contributed to the conflict, restrict the use of the power to once per event, and provide compensation for affected visa holders. Steggall argued the bill was indefinite, lacked guardrails, and allowed for arbitrary exclusion of valid visa holders.

Le supported Steggall's amendments and criticised the bill as an unprecedented grab for executive power that lacked natural justice and parliamentary veto. Le highlighted the risk of people being detained upon arrival if visas were suspended while they were in transit and argued that integrity comes from transparency, not concentrated executive power.

Freelander ruled that Steggall's amendment 10, which proposed compensation for affected visa holders, was out of order. Freelander stated that the amendment required the appropriation of revenue, which contravened the constitutional rule that the Crown must initiate financial measures and standing order 180.