Matt Keogh
Australian Labor Party Member for Burt
Currently sitting
Photo: Australian Department of Defence, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Seat and party history (1)
- Australian Labor Party - Burt (House) - 2 Jul 2016 to present
- Seat and party records: OpenAustralia member data.
Contact
Electorate office: (08) 9390 0180
Unit 2, 2808 Albany Highway, Kelmscott WA 6111
Office details: Parliament of Australia, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
Contact details on aph.gov.au Profile on OpenAustraliaNot sure if this is your member? Find your electorate (AEC)
These counts cover what is on this site only. They do not measure electorate work or committee work.
Compared with other members
Matt Keogh compared with all 150 sitting House members.
Questions asked in Question Time
Lower than 81% of House members- This member
- 0
- Average
- 11.2
- Median
- 12
Debates spoken in
Higher than 68% of House members- This member
- 41
- Average
- 35.9
- Median
- 30.5
Votes cast
Lower than 52% of House members- This member
- 256
- Average
- 253.0
- Median
- 265
Share of divisions voted in
Lower than 53% of House members- This member
- 77%
- Average
- 79%
- Median
- 81%
Read these with care
- The median is the middle member: half did more, half did less. It is less affected by a few very active members than the average.
- Ministers answer questions rather than ask them, and the presiding officers rarely vote, so their patterns differ.
- Government backbenchers are often given arranged "Dorothy Dixer" questions, which raises their question counts.
- Votes only record ayes and noes, so a missed vote cannot be told apart from a pair (an agreed absence).
- Counts cover only what is on this site, and do not measure electorate or committee work. New members have less history.
Question Time
No questions recorded for this member.
Question from Emma Comer
The member asked how the government was growing the Defence Force and what difficulties had been faced in the past.
Background: The government has taken steps to reverse the shrinking of the Defence Force under the previous administration.
Answer from Matt Keogh
The minister reported that recruitment numbers had reached over 8,000 in the current year, the highest in 16 years, and that separation rates had dropped to 7.4 per cent. He highlighted investments in healthcare, housing, education, and a continuation bonus. He noted that recruitment timelines had been accelerated to under a year, with critical roles taking as little as 150 days, compared to over a year under the previous government.
Question from Michael McCormack
The member asked if any ex-service organisation supported the government's proposal to limit veterans' access to allied health services.
Background: The member cited criticism from RSL Australia regarding caps on allied health services for veterans.
Answer from Matt Keogh
The Minister stated that the government had engaged extensively with RSL and other veteran organisations. He explained that the measures were designed to increase access by removing treatment cycles and ensuring continuity of care. He claimed to have received support for the program from the veteran community and ex-service organisations. The Minister affirmed his commitment to continuing engagement to ensure the program delivers improved access.
Question from Michael McCormack
The member asked who brought forward the plan to cut $750 million from veterans' allied health support, given the Royal Commission's recommendations.
Background: The member noted that the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide did not recommend capping allied health care.
Answer from Matt Keogh
The Minister stated that the government was committed to implementing the Royal Commission's recommendations, including establishing the Defence and Veterans' Service Commission. He argued that the current measures increased fees for allied health professionals, addressing recommendation 71. The Minister framed the changes as improving access for the veteran community rather than cutting support.
Question from Melissa Price
The member asked why the minister was delaying the release of the women veterans strategy, citing accusations of gaslighting.
Background: The member referred to assertions by Women Veterans Australia that the minister was postponing the publication of a women veterans strategy.
Answer from Matt Keogh
The Minister acknowledged concerns from women veterans about gaps in support within a system designed primarily for male members. He stated that the Department of Veterans' Affairs and Defence were conducting complex consultations to develop the strategy. The Minister emphasized the importance of getting the strategy right and thanked those engaged in the work.
Question from Michael McCormack
The member asked whether the minister was confident that veterans believed he was upholding the covenant oath, given allegations of contemptuous treatment.
Background: The member cited claims from veterans and advocates that the minister had treated them with contempt, questioning his adherence to the Veterans' Covenant Oath.
Answer from Matt Keogh
The minister affirmed the importance of the covenant and acknowledged past failings in the system across multiple governments. He stated that the government was working to implement recommendations from the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide and improve support systems. He noted that rebuilding trust in the Department of Veterans' Affairs was an ongoing process requiring continued investment and collaboration with the veteran community.
Question from Phillip Thompson
The member asked why the minister had not contacted the CEO of the organization representing war widows regarding the discussion paper.
Background: The member cited the CEO of the Families of Veterans Guild, who claimed she only learned of a discussion paper on allied health caps in question time.
Answer from Matt Keogh
The minister stated he had had many engagements with the CEO and her organization. He clarified that while he had not had a direct conversation with her specifically about the discussion paper, the government had announced it would consult with the veteran community to ensure no gaps in service provision. He expressed anticipation for receiving feedback from her and other ex-service organizations.
Question from Michael McCormack
The member asked how the minister could continue in his role if he could not uphold Defence values, citing specific criticism from a veteran.
Background: The member quoted a former Navy diver who claimed the minister failed to display Defence values during a meeting.
Answer from Matt Keogh
The minister acknowledged the tragic circumstances faced by the veteran and expressed understanding of his feelings. He stated that the Navy had apologized for past conduct. He expressed regret that the veteran held a negative view of him but reiterated his commitment to improving the support system for serving personnel and veterans.
Question from Phillip Thompson
The member asked whether the minister was calling the veteran a liar after disagreeing with the characterization of his behavior.
Background: The member quoted a former Air Force pilot describing the minister's body language in a meeting as disrespectful.
Answer from Matt Keogh
The minister stated that he respected the positions put to him by veterans but did not repeat the content or detail of private conversations in parliament. He maintained that his previous answer stood and declined to elaborate further on the specific meeting.
Question from Michael McCormack
The member asked if the Minister would apologize for allegedly rolling his eyes at veterans during a meeting about allied health care caps.
Background: The Minister for Veterans' Affairs had met with veterans regarding caps on allied health care, with one veteran alleging disrespectful behavior.
Answer from Matt Keogh
The Minister acknowledged he had been wrong to delay the meeting but denied the characterization of disrespectful behavior, stating he had shaken hands with attendees. He emphasized that the government's intention was to ensure no gap in care while improving access and payments to providers. He noted that a consultation process was underway to refine the changes to allied health services, including a $5,000 threshold with alternative approval processes for complex needs.
Question from Phillip Thompson
The member asked if the Minister would scrap the $5,000 allied health cap, citing previous delays in restoring funding and meeting with veterans.
Background: The Minister had recently met with veterans regarding cuts to allied health care funding.
Answer from Matt Keogh
The Minister explained that the changes were designed to improve access by attracting more practitioners and reducing the need for continual referrals. He stated that the $5,000 threshold would apply to the majority of veterans, with an alternative approval process for those with complex clinical needs. He noted that a discussion paper would be released shortly to facilitate consultation with veterans and service providers.
Question from Michael McCormack
The member asked the Minister for Veterans' Affairs why he had refused to meet with veterans concerned about a $5,000 cap on allied health services.
Background: The member cited concerns from veterans about a reported $5,000 cap on allied health services and the minister's refusal to meet them.
Answer from Matt Keogh
The minister stated that the government had committed nearly $170 million to increase fees for allied health providers and was removing the 12-session treatment cycle. He clarified that the $5,000 figure referred to a threshold for engaging with the veteran community, not a cap on services. He noted that he was unable to meet with the veterans that day but was finalizing a discussion paper for broad consultation to ensure seamless service delivery.
Question from David Farley
The member asked why the government would not exempt the estimated 30,000 veterans who may exceed the $5,000 allied health cap.
Background: A $5,000 cap on allied health services for veterans was introduced.
Answer from Matt Keogh
The minister explained that the cap replaces the previous system requiring veterans to return to GPs after 12 referrals, benefiting nine in 10 veterans. He stated that for the remaining one in 10, the government is engaging to ensure appropriate care while maintaining system integrity. He also highlighted significant increases in fees paid to allied health professionals to ensure continued service provision.
Question from Rebekha Sharkie
The member asked if the government would raise or reverse the proposed $5,000 cap on veterans' allied health services, given concerns that veterans would have to choose between physical and psychological support.
Background: The member cited a veteran who would hit the proposed $5,000 limit for allied health services in four months, asking if the government would raise or reverse the cap.
Answer from Matt Keogh
The Minister stated that the government was increasing allied health fees and scrapping the treatment cycle that required new referrals every 12 sessions. He explained that the $5,000 allocation replaced this cycle, but any veteran with a clinical need to exceed this amount would be able to access additional services. The Minister noted that the median use was $1,900, and around one in 10 veterans might exceed the cap. He committed to consulting with the veterans community to establish an approval system for additional services.
Question from Luke Gosling
The member asked about the significance of the opening for the commemoration of military service in Australia.
Background: The official opening of the atrium and Anzac Hall at the Australian War Memorial had taken place.
Answer from Matt Keogh
The Minister described the Memorial as a sacred place listing over 103,000 names of those who died in conflict. He explained that the expansion allows for the telling of stories from modern conflicts such as Afghanistan and peacekeeping operations. He noted the project involved nearly 2,000 workers, including veterans, and included the largest geothermal system in the Southern Hemisphere. He stated that the Memorial remained open during construction. He looked forward to the completion of pre-1914 galleries and an interactive learning centre by 2028.
Question from Andrew Gee
The member asked if the government would support and fund a proposed veterans' and families' wellbeing hub in Bathurst, for which the RSL had land and a building.
Background: The Bathurst RSL Sub Branch submitted a proposal for a veterans' wellbeing hub in Bathurst.
Answer from Matt Keogh
The Minister acknowledged the business case provided by the member and noted that hubs were being delivered as committed in the 2022 and 2025 elections. He stated that from 1 July, changes to veterans entitlement legislation would simplify the system from three complex systems to one. A new veteran and family wellbeing agency would also be established from 1 July to coordinate support. The Minister indicated that submissions for further hubs, including the Bathurst proposal, would be reviewed after the new agency was operational.
Question from Andrew Wilkie
The member asked whether the government would commit to keeping the workshop at its current location or funding a new facility, citing its importance for veteran wellbeing and Royal Commission recommendations.
Background: The member for Clark asked the Minister for Veterans' Affairs about the future of the Defence and Veterans Workshop in Hobart, which faces displacement due to the sale of Derwent Barracks.
Answer from Matt Keogh
The Minister confirmed that the Defence and Veterans Workshop will remain onsite at Derwent Barracks following community feedback and consultations led by the Assistant Minister for Defence. He noted that the government has implemented 32 of the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide recommendations and aims to implement two-thirds by year-end. He emphasized that the divestment of the site is being managed carefully to ensure the workshop continues to serve the veteran community.
Question from Anne Urquhart
The member asked how the government is supporting veterans and their families.
Background: A government member asked the Minister for Veterans' Affairs how the government is supporting veterans and their families.
Answer from Matt Keogh
The Minister highlighted investments in the Department of Veterans' Affairs to clear claim backlogs, with initial liability claims now processed within months. He noted the implementation of 32 Royal Commission recommendations and the establishment of a new wellbeing agency. He also mentioned increased fees for GPs and allied health professionals to improve access for veterans and a review of travel funding for Victoria Cross recipients.
Question from Phillip Thompson
The member asked the Prime Minister how many veterans would be out of pocket due to a $5,000 annual cap on allied health services, alleging a broken promise.
Background: The Shadow Minister for Defence Personnel raised concerns about allied health services for veterans.
Answer from Anthony Albanese; Matt Keogh; Tony Burke
The Prime Minister stated that the government had cleared a backlog of 42,000 veteran compensation claims, with claims now processed within 14 days. The Minister for Veterans' Affairs added that the budget included $169.7 million to increase allied health provider fees, with physiotherapy rates rising from $75.10 to $110 in July 2027. He explained that the $5,000 limit replaced a treatment cycle constraint, and veterans with genuine clinical need could exceed it.
Question from Michael McCormack
The member asked why the government prioritized net zero spending and tax increases while cutting funding for veteran health services.
Background: The member for Riverina asked why the Prime Minister prioritized net zero spending and tax increases while cutting $600 million from veteran health services.
Answer from Anthony Albanese; Matt Keogh
The Prime Minister stated that the budget included significant additional investment in veterans' affairs, including $800 million in response to the royal commission into veteran suicide. He noted that the government had addressed a backlog of claims by increasing public servants. The Minister for Veterans' Affairs added that an annual monetary cap for allied health services was introduced to remove overservicing, while increasing fees paid to allied health professionals by $169 million to improve access to care.
Question from Anne Urquhart
The member asked how the government provided assistance for veterans to obtain complimentary advocacy services and the reasons for its significance.
Background: A government member asked the Minister for Veterans' Affairs how the government was providing assistance to veterans so they could obtain complimentary advocacy services.
Answer from Matt Keogh
The minister said the government was putting over $203 million into strengthening DVA's integrity controls and broadening access to free advocacy services. He pointed out that private advocates had been levying steep fees and commissions. Funding for the Building Excellence in Support and Training Grants Program had been doubled, with three-year certainty given to veteran groups to hire and train advocates. This action responded to recommendation 99 of the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide.
Question from Justine Elliot
The member asked how the government was supporting veterans and how this compared to the inherited situation.
Background: The government was supporting the veteran community.
Answer from Matt Keogh
The Minister announced a veterans and families hub in the Tweed and highlighted improved claims processing and access to medical and psychosocial support. He stated that the Department of Veterans' Affairs had been chronically underfunded and underresourced under the previous government, with six ministers in nine years. He credited his predecessor for acknowledging the dire situation and criticized the opposition for prioritizing political advantage over veteran needs.
Question from Mary Doyle
The member asked about Defence delivery and alternative approaches.
Background: The member asked how the government was delivering for Defence.
Answer from Matt Keogh
The minister highlighted record Defence investments, including warships delivered ahead of schedule, autonomous Ghost Shark submarines, missile production in Australian factories, and counterdrone capabilities. He also mentioned the acquisition of stealth fighters and increased long-range strike capabilities for the Navy.
Question from David Smith
The member asked what the government is doing to grow ADF capabilities in new domains and why this is important.
Background: The government is expanding Defence capabilities in space and cyber domains.
Answer from Matt Keogh
The Minister announced the launch of new direct recruitment roles for space operator officers and specialists. He explained that these roles support satellite communication, missile detection, and intelligence. He noted that Defence recruitment had reached its highest level in 15 years and separation rates were at historic lows.
Question from Darren Chester
The member asked whether the 20-year time limit on Defence Honours and Awards Appeals Tribunal inquiries would have excluded Teddy Sheean's gallantry from review, referencing a past media release by the Prime Minister.
Background: The Shadow Minister for Veterans' Affairs cited a 2020 media release by the then-Prime Minister supporting a Victoria Cross for Teddy Sheean, asking if the new 20-year time limit on tribunal inquiries would have prevented a review of Sheean's case.
Answer from Matt Keogh
The Minister argued that the member was misleading the House by implying the tribunal's actions affected the previous government's decision. He stated that the previous government had rejected the tribunal's recommendation for Teddy Sheean and established a separate process due to pressure from veterans and the opposition. He clarified that an application for honour could still be brought to Defence and an inquiry conducted, regardless of the tribunal's modernization efforts.
Question from Tony Zappia
The member asked the Minister for Veterans' Affairs how the government was supporting veterans at risk of homelessness and what delays had occurred.
Background: Veterans are at higher risk of homelessness, and funding for support had been delayed.
Answer from Matt Keogh
The Minister stated that around 6,000 veterans were at risk of homelessness annually, with 1,500 homeless on census night. He explained that $30 million in election funding for veteran housing and support services was blocked in the Senate by the Coalition and Greens. This delay held up $24 million for infrastructure projects and $6 million for expert care. The funding was finally rolled out in June last year, supporting eight organisations for housing and five for wraparound services.
Question from Andrew Gee
The member asked if the minister would meet with local veterans in Bathurst and Orange to consider a proposal for establishing wellbeing hubs in the Central West of New South Wales, given the lack of such facilities in the region.
Background: An independent member asked the Minister for Veterans' Affairs about establishing wellbeing hubs in the Central West of New South Wales, citing the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide.
Answer from Matt Keogh
The minister acknowledged the importance of holistic wellbeing care as highlighted by the Royal Commission. He noted that 17 veterans and families hubs had already been opened, with locations selected based on veteran concentration. He confirmed that the government had accepted the recommendation to establish a specialist wellbeing agency within the Department of Veterans' Affairs. He agreed to meet with the member and local RSL sub-branches to discuss delivering appropriate services and support to the veteran community in that area.
Question from Libby Coker
The member asked the minister how the government was implementing the recommendations from the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide.
Background: The member asked the Minister for Veterans' Affairs about addressing the recommendations of the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide.
Answer from Matt Keogh
The minister reported that the government had eliminated the DVA claims backlog and passed legislation to simplify veteran entitlements. He noted that the government had agreed to 104 of 122 recommendations from the final report and established a taskforce for implementation. He highlighted the establishment of the Defence and Veterans' Services Commission and a new wellbeing agency within DVA.
Question from Meryl Swanson
The member asked how the government was supporting veterans and whether any threats to this support existed.
Background: A government member asked the Minister for Veterans' Affairs about support for veterans and potential threats to this support.
Answer from Matt Keogh
The Minister stated that the Department of Veterans' Affairs was the best resourced in decades, with 640 additional staff hired since 2022. He reported that the backlog of 42,000 unallocated claims had been cleared, reducing allocation time from 200 days to 14 days. He noted that claims lodged had increased from 66,000 in 2021-22 to 89,530 last year, with 148,294 decisions made in the first eight months of the current year. He warned that the opposition planned to roll back these staffing levels, which would threaten the processing of claims.
Question from Tania Lawrence
The member asked how workers at the Department of Veterans' Affairs had improved claims processing and what risks existed to this progress.
Background: A government member asked the Veterans' Minister about the impact of staff on claims processing and threats to this progress.
Answer from Matt Keogh
The Minister stated that the government had cleared a backlog of 42,000 claims by hiring more permanent staff. He noted that initial liability claims were now determined in a few months. He warned that the opposition's plan to cut public service staff would lead to new backlogs and delays, citing the DVA secretary's warning that reduced staffing would slow decision-making.
Question from Luke Gosling
The member asked what the government had done to clear the backlog of veteran compensation claims and whether threats to this progress existed.
Background: A government member asked about progress on veteran compensation claims.
Answer from Matt Keogh
The Minister stated that the government had engaged 500 additional staff to address a backlog of 42,000 claims, resulting in faster processing times. He identified the opposition's proposals to cut staff in the Department of Veterans' Affairs as a threat that would leave veterans worse off by reducing support services.
Question from Tania Lawrence
The member asked how the government had improved veterans' services and if alternative policies would harm them.
Background: A government member asked the Veterans' Minister about improvements to veterans' lives and whether any proposals would leave them worse off.
Answer from Matt Keogh
The Minister stated that the government had hired 500 additional claims-processing staff, reducing wait times and processing over 100,000 claims in the last financial year compared to 53,508 in 2021-22. He noted that veterans had received $13 billion in benefits. He warned that the opposition's plan to cut 36,000 public service roles would jeopardise these services.
Other Parliamentary Activity
-
Defence Force Discipline Amendment (RCDVS Implementation and Related Measures No. 1) Bill 2026; Consideration of Senate Message
House of Representatives · Thursday 17 September 2026 · Consideration of Senate Message
Opened this debate
-
Albanese Government; Attempted Censure
House of Representatives · Monday 14 September 2026 · General Debate
Responded as minister
-
Veterans
House of Representatives · Wednesday 19 August 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Responded as minister
-
Defence Legislation Amendment (RCDVS Implementation and Related Measures No. 2) Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 1 July 2026 · Second Reading
Responded as minister
-
Defence Legislation Amendment (RCDVS Implementation and Related Measures No. 2) Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Thursday 25 June 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Gambling Advertising
House of Representatives · Monday 22 June 2026 · General Debate
Responded as minister
-
Defence Force Discipline Amendment (RCDVS Implementation and Related Measures No. 1) Bill 2026; Third Reading
House of Representatives · Thursday 14 May 2026 · Third Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
Defence Force Discipline Amendment (RCDVS Implementation and Related Measures No. 1) Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 13 May 2026 · Second Reading
Responded as minister
-
Defence Force Discipline Amendment (RCDVS Implementation and Related Measures No. 1) Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 1 April 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Defence and Veterans' Service Commissioner Bill 2025; Consideration of Senate Message
House of Representatives · Tuesday 31 March 2026 · Consideration of Senate Message
Opened this debate
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Genetic Testing Protections in Life Insurance and Other Measures) Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Monday 23 March 2026 · Second Reading
Responded as minister
-
Appropriation Bill (No. 3) 2025-2026, Appropriation Bill (No. 4) 2025-2026, Appropriation (Parliamentary Departments) Bill (No. 2) 2025-2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Thursday 12 March 2026 · Second Reading
Responded as minister
-
Defence and Veterans' Service Commissioner Bill 2025; Third Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 11 February 2026 · Third Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
Defence and Veterans' Service Commissioner Bill 2025; Consideration in Detail
House of Representatives · Wednesday 11 February 2026 · Consideration in Detail
Responded as minister
-
Defence and Veterans' Service Commissioner Bill 2025, Defence and Veterans' Service Commissioner (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 11 February 2026 · Second Reading
Responded as minister
-
Defence and Veterans' Service Commissioner (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2025; Third Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 11 February 2026 · Third Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
Veterans' Affairs Legislation Amendment (Miscellaneous Measures No. 2) Bill 2025; Third Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 4 February 2026 · Third Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
Veterans' Affairs Legislation Amendment (Miscellaneous Measures No. 2) Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 4 February 2026 · Second Reading
Responded as minister
-
Veterans' Affairs Legislation Amendment (Miscellaneous Measures No. 2) Bill 2025; Consideration in Detail
House of Representatives · Wednesday 4 February 2026 · Consideration in Detail
Opened this debate
-
Bondi Beach Attack Victims
House of Representatives · Monday 19 January 2026 · Condolence
Contributed to this debate
-
Veterans' Affairs Legislation Amendment (Miscellaneous Measures No. 2) Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Thursday 27 November 2025 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Defence and Veterans' Service Commissioner Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Thursday 27 November 2025 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Defence and Veterans' Service Commissioner (Consequential and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Thursday 27 November 2025 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Veterans' Affairs Legislation Amendment (Miscellaneous Measures No. 1) Bill 2025; Third Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 26 November 2025 · Third Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
Veterans' Affairs Legislation Amendment (Miscellaneous Measures No. 1) Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 26 November 2025 · Second Reading
Responded as minister
-
Gambling Advertising
House of Representatives · Wednesday 26 November 2025 · General Debate
Responded as minister
-
Veterans' Affairs Legislation Amendment (Miscellaneous Measures No. 1) Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 29 October 2025 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Manufacturing Industry
House of Representatives · Thursday 9 October 2025 · Matter of Public Importance
Responded as minister
-
Appropriation Bill (No. 1) 2025-2026; Consideration in Detail
House of Representatives · Tuesday 7 October 2025 · Consideration in Detail
Responded as minister
-
Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide; Reference to Federation Chamber
House of Representatives · Thursday 4 September 2025 · General Debate
Contributed to this debate
-
Defence Amendment (Defence Honours and Awards Appeals Tribunal) Bill 2025; Third Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 3 September 2025 · Third Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
Defence Amendment (Defence Honours and Awards Appeals Tribunal) Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 3 September 2025 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
Defence Amendment (Defence Honours and Awards Appeals Tribunal) Bill 2025; Consideration in Detail
House of Representatives · Wednesday 3 September 2025 · Consideration in Detail
Responded as minister
-
Defence Amendment (Defence Honours and Awards Appeals Tribunal) Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Thursday 28 August 2025 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
His Holiness Pope Francis
House of Representatives · Wednesday 30 July 2025 · Condolence
Contributed to this debate
-
Defence Housing Australia Amendment Bill 2025; Third Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 30 July 2025 · Third Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
Defence Housing Australia Amendment Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Thursday 24 July 2025 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Veterans' Entitlements, Treatment and Support (Simplification and Harmonisation) Bill 2024; Consideration of Senate Message
House of Representatives · Thursday 13 February 2025 · Consideration of Senate Message
Responded as minister
-
Defence Service Homes Amendment (Insurance) Bill 2025; Third Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 5 February 2025 · Third Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
Defence Service Homes Amendment (Insurance) Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 5 February 2025 · Second Reading
Responded as minister
-
Defence Service Homes Amendment (Insurance) Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Tuesday 4 February 2025 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
- Votes recorded
- 256
- Aye votes (58.6%)
- 150
- No votes (41.4%)
- 106
Showing the latest 50 votes.
-
Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Amendment (Veterans' Healthcare With...
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 85, Noes 40 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Rearrangement
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 42, Noes 87 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 88, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 86, Noes 47 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 45, Noes 87 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 46, Noes 86 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Rearrangement
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 84, Noes 13 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Rearrangement
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 49, Noes 87 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Consideration of Legislation
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 43, Noes 87 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; Consideration of Senate Message
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 95, Noes 43 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; Consideration of Senate Message
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 95, Noes 42 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Albanese Government; Attempted Censure
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 46, Noes 86 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Statute Update Bill 2026; Consideration of Senate Message
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 84, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minim...
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 95, Noes 37 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minim...
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 96, Noes 36 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative-Improved Forest Management in Multi...
10 Sep 2026 · Ayes 38, Noes 92 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation...
9 Sep 2026 · Ayes 52, Noes 86 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Gun Control
9 Sep 2026 · Ayes 88, Noes 47 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Veterans
7 Sep 2026 · Ayes 88, Noes 49 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Cash Distribution Framework Bill 2026; Consideration of Senate Message
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 84, Noes 34 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Economy
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 41, Noes 85 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026; Considerati...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 36 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment Bill 2026; Report from Federation Cha...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 39, Noes 90 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Australia's Foreign Relations (State and Territory Arrangements) Amendment Bi...
19 Aug 2026 · Ayes 38, Noes 80 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Combatting Illicit Tobacco Bill 2026; Report from Federation Chamber
19 Aug 2026 · Ayes 41, Noes 84 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Minister for Veterans' Affairs
19 Aug 2026 · Ayes 83, Noes 44 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
News Media Bargaining (Administration) Bill 2026; Consideration in Detail
19 Aug 2026 · Ayes 12, Noes 65 · Failed
VOTED NO -
News Journalism Payments Bill 2026; Second Reading
19 Aug 2026 · Ayes 40, Noes 83 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026; Third Reading
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 103, Noes 14 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026; Consideration in ...
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 102, Noes 14 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026; Consideration in ...
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 33, Noes 95 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026; Consideration in ...
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 96, Noes 9 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026; Second Reading
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 12, Noes 86 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026; Second Reading
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 12, Noes 85 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 87, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Minister for Veterans' Affairs and Defence Personnel; Attempted Censure
17 Aug 2026 · Ayes 86, Noes 43 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Cash Distribution Framework Bill 2026; Reference to Federation Chamber
12 Aug 2026 · Ayes 40, Noes 83 · Failed
VOTED NO -
International Relations: Australia and Japan
12 Aug 2026 · Ayes 88, Noes 41 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Aged Care Amendment (Restoring Human Override for Aged Care Needs Assessments...
11 Aug 2026 · Ayes 42, Noes 87 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Suspension of Standing and Sessional Orders
11 Aug 2026 · Ayes 74, Noes 12 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Rearrangement
11 Aug 2026 · Ayes 86, Noes 47 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Rearrangement
2 Jul 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 42 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Minister for Defence Industry; Attempted Censure
2 Jul 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 41 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Health Insurance Amendment (Incentive Payments and Other Measures) Bill 2026;...
2 Jul 2026 · Ayes 39, Noes 92 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Social Policy and Legal Affairs Committee; Reference
2 Jul 2026 · Ayes 13, Noes 78 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Social Policy and Legal Affairs Committee; Reference
2 Jul 2026 · Ayes 72, Noes 12 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Joint Committee; Appointment
2 Jul 2026 · Ayes 38, Noes 101 · Failed
VOTED NO -
National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future ...
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 33 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Health Legislation Amendment (Prescribing of Pharmaceutical Benefits) Bill 20...
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 43 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Health Legislation Amendment (Prescribing of Pharmaceutical Benefits) Bill 20...
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 43 · Passed
VOTED AYE
About this page
This page tracks Matt Keogh's parliamentary activity: questions asked and answered in Question Time, debates spoken in, and votes in divisions. Summaries are in reported speech, not transcripts; each one links to the official record.