Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Consideration in Detail

Defence and Veterans' Service Commissioner Bill 2025; Consideration in Detail

House of Representatives · Wednesday 11 February 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on an amendment moved by the Coalition to require the first implementation assessment of royal commission recommendations by 30 September 2026, rather than the bill's original date of 2 December 2027. The shadow minister argued that earlier reporting would strengthen accountability and allow for timely assessment of reform progress. The Minister for Veterans' Affairs opposed the amendment, stating that the commission was already conducting inquiries and that the proposed date would interrupt ongoing work. The amendment was defeated in a division.

Outcome

The amendment was not passed, with 47 votes in favour and 86 against.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Thompson moved an amendment to Clause 18 to change the deadline for the first implementation review from 2 December 2027 to 30 September 2026. Thompson argued that the original timeline was too slow and risked weakening accountability for veterans and their families. The member stated that an earlier assessment would allow parliament and the public to see measurable progress on royal commission recommendations within two years of the final report. Thompson maintained that this change would not affect the commissioner's independence but would reinforce transparency and ensure reforms were delivered promptly.

Government response

Keogh acknowledged the opposition's desire for earlier reporting but opposed the amendment on the grounds that it would disrupt ongoing work. The minister noted that 32 recommendations had already been implemented and that two-thirds would be completed by the end of 2026. Keogh pointed out that the commission had already commenced its first inquiry into specific recommendations regarding information access for veterans and families. The minister suggested that the proposal was better suited for consideration by the Senate inquiry examining the legislation.

Votes during this debate

Division 3: Defence and Veterans' Service Commissioner Bill 2025; Consideration in Detail Not passed 47–86