Question Time AU

General Debate

Gambling Advertising

House of Representatives · Wednesday 26 November 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on a motion moved by Andrew Wilkie urging the Prime Minister and Leader of the Opposition to allow a free vote on implementing a three-year phase-out of gambling advertising. Wilkie and Rebekha Sharkie argued that the delay in acting on the Murphy Report recommendations was causing significant harm, particularly to young people, and that the parliament was paralysed by party lines despite broad community support for reform. Matt Keogh moved to adjourn the debate, effectively ending the discussion without a vote on the substantive motion. The division on the adjournment motion passed with 87 votes in favour and 14 against.

Outcome

The motion to adjourn the debate was passed by 87 votes to 14.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Wilkie argued that an urgent free vote was necessary to allow members to use their own judgement on phasing out gambling advertising over three years, as recommended by the Murphy Report. Wilkie cited evidence from the Australia Institute indicating that nearly one million young people aged 12 to 19 gambled in the previous year, attributing this to advertising that normalised gambling and groomed children. Wilkie contended that the current political impasse ignored the wishes of the community and the majority of members who supported a ban. Wilkie emphasised that the government had the financial resources to assist media and sporting bodies in transitioning away from gambling revenue, which he described as harmful to vulnerable communities.

Votes during this debate

Division 1: Gambling Advertising Passed 87–14