Question Time AU

General Debate

Gambling Advertising

House of Representatives · Monday 22 June 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Monique Ryan moved a motion urging the government to conduct public consultation on proposed gambling advertising reforms, arguing that the current process excluded those affected by harm. Kate Chaney seconded the motion, criticising the government's response to the Murphy report as inadequate and favouring industry interests over public health. Matt Keogh moved to adjourn the debate, effectively ending the discussion without a vote on the substantive motion.

Outcome

The debate was adjourned following the motion moved by Matt Keogh.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Ryan argued that gambling advertising causes significant harm to over three million Australians annually. Ryan contended that the government's exposure draft of the Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026 was released with limited consultation, excluding the public and affected communities. Ryan highlighted that former leaders and crossbench members had indicated the proposed reforms were insufficient. Ryan called for transparent public consultation to allow genuine co-design of the legislation before its introduction.

Votes during this debate

Division 1: Gambling Advertising Passed 72–13