Question Time AU

Matter of Public Importance

Manufacturing Industry

House of Representatives · Thursday 9 October 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on the viability of Australian manufacturing under the current government's energy and industrial policies. Opposition members argued that high energy costs, a reliance on renewables, and regulatory burdens were driving industry decline and necessitating taxpayer bailouts. Government members countered that the previous administration had dismantled manufacturing sectors, while the current government was actively rebuilding the industrial base through significant investment and trade agreements. The discussion highlighted conflicting views on energy reliability, the cost of transition, and the historical record of both major parties regarding industrial support.

Outcome

The matter of public importance was debated without a vote being taken.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Littleproud argued that the government's manufacturing agenda was an expensive slogan that failed to address fundamental competitiveness issues, particularly regarding energy costs. Littleproud claimed that over $3 billion in bailouts had been required to keep industries alive, citing risks to operations in Port Pirie, Mount Isa, and Whyalla. Littleproud contended that the push for an all-renewables energy grid was reckless and economically damaging, referencing a cost estimate of $1.382 trillion from Rainforest Reserves. Littleproud further criticised the safeguards mechanism and carbon border adjustment mechanism as inflationary measures that would raise costs for consumers and businesses.

Government response

Keogh asserted that the previous Liberal-National government had devastated the manufacturing sector by removing support for the car industry and sending jobs offshore. Keogh highlighted the current government's investments, including $15 billion through the National Reconstruction Fund and specific projects like the Ghost Shark and Henderson maritime complex. Keogh emphasised that the government was supporting vital industries such as the Mount Isa copper smelter and Whyalla steelworks to secure regional jobs. Keogh also noted improvements in agricultural market access and the creation of 7,500 additional manufacturing businesses since 2020.

Opposition response

Willcox characterised the government's interventions as band-aids that failed to fix underlying structural issues, particularly high energy prices. Willcox pointed to recent bailouts for Whyalla, Nyrstar, and Glencore as evidence of policy failure, noting that Alcoa was still closing despite government efforts. Willcox argued that heavy industry requires reliable baseload power, which renewables cannot consistently provide, and criticised the government's migration policy for not prioritising skilled tradespeople. Willcox also highlighted discrepancies in infrastructure funding, such as the Bruce Highway project, as further evidence of neglect.