Sam Rae
Australian Labor Party Member for Hawke
Currently sitting
Seat and party history (1)
- Australian Labor Party - Hawke (House) - 21 May 2022 to present
- Seat and party records: OpenAustralia member data.
Contact
Electorate office: (03) 9070 1960
316 High Street, Melton VIC 3337
Office details: Parliament of Australia, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
Contact details on aph.gov.au Profile on OpenAustraliaNot sure if this is your member? Find your electorate (AEC)
These counts cover what is on this site only. They do not measure electorate work or committee work.
Compared with other members
Sam Rae compared with all 150 sitting House members.
Questions asked in Question Time
Lower than 74% of House members- This member
- 2
- Average
- 11.2
- Median
- 12
Debates spoken in
Lower than 84% of House members- This member
- 14
- Average
- 35.9
- Median
- 30.5
Votes cast
Lower than 53% of House members- This member
- 251
- Average
- 253.0
- Median
- 265
Share of divisions voted in
Lower than 54% of House members- This member
- 76%
- Average
- 79%
- Median
- 81%
Read these with care
- The median is the middle member: half did more, half did less. It is less affected by a few very active members than the average.
- Ministers answer questions rather than ask them, and the presiding officers rarely vote, so their patterns differ.
- Government backbenchers are often given arranged "Dorothy Dixer" questions, which raises their question counts.
- Votes only record ayes and noes, so a missed vote cannot be told apart from a pair (an agreed absence).
- Counts cover only what is on this site, and do not measure electorate or committee work. New members have less history.
Question Time
Question from Sam Rae
The member asked how the government is reforming the sector to help families manage living expenses and whether any factors could put these reforms at risk.
Background: The government has implemented reforms to the early childhood education sector.
Answer from Anne Aly
The Minister outlined reforms focused on affordability, supply, and workforce stability. She noted that a family earning $120,000 is better off by $2,768 annually due to cheaper childcare. She highlighted fee caps linked to wage increases, limiting fee rises to 4.4 per cent initially and 4.2 per cent subsequently. She warned that the opposition's lack of policy and reliance on cuts would leave families worse off, contrasting this with the government's commitment to building early learning centers and guaranteeing 72 hours of subsidized care per fortnight.
Question from Sam Rae
The member asked what the government was doing to reduce student debt and if alternative approaches would harm students.
Background: A government member asked about government actions to cut student debt and the response to these reforms.
Answer from Jason Clare
The Minister stated that the government had already cut HECS debt by over $3 billion for three million Australians. He announced a commitment to reduce all student debts by an additional 20 per cent if re-elected, which would save an average debtor over $5,000. He contrasted this with the opposition's policy, which he claimed would cost $1.6 billion annually by having workers pay for corporate lunches.
Question from Michael McCormack
The member asked if the minister would apologise for causing stress to veterans through policy reversals or resign.
Background: The National Party member accused the Veterans' Minister of reversing policies on allied health caps and medal recognition.
Answer from Sam Rae
The minister stated that the government had listened to feedback from veterans and ex-service organisations regarding allied health access. Consequently, the threshold for allied health services was not proceeding, but fee increases for practitioners were maintained to ensure service continuity. He highlighted the passage of legislation implementing 40 recommendations from the Royal Commission into Defence and Veteran Suicide.
Question from Rebekha Sharkie
The member asked when the government would concede it was failing in aged care, citing high numbers of patients in hospitals, low bed additions, and long wait times for Support at Home packages.
Background: Data showed a significant increase in older patients waiting for aged care in South Australian hospitals, from 60 in October 2022 to 487, while net bed additions remained low compared to demand.
Answer from Sam Rae
The minister stated the aged care system was being rebuilt following a royal commission. He noted a new national definition for delayed discharges had been agreed upon to improve data consistency. He highlighted a $25 billion hospital funding deal to reduce waiting lists and get patients out of hospitals. He announced $115 million in additional investment for residential aged care capacity in hotspot areas, including 73 new beds in the Illawarra and 268 in Adelaide. Regarding Support at Home, he stated the system had nearly tripled since 2020, with urgent priority cases receiving packages within a month and high priority cases within about a month.
Question from Allegra Spender
The member asked if the government would create a compulsory automated-decision-making system with people checking it, as the robodebt royal commission advised, to boost confidence in the aged care assessment tool.
Background: A Four Corners report criticized the integrated assessment tool for home care packages as flawed.
Answer from Sam Rae
The Minister defended the integrated assessment tool as a key recommendation of the royal commission, designed to ensure equitable treatment. She announced a new legislated escalation pathway allowing outcomes to be changed in extenuating circumstances. She noted that the median wait time for assessments was under one month and that a rapid review of the prioritization mechanism was underway to ensure urgent cases were fast-tracked.
Question from Carina Garland
The member asked how pay rises were delivering change for aged-care workers and older Australians, and why this change was necessary.
Background: A government member asked about the impact of pay rises for aged-care workers after a decade of neglect.
Answer from Sam Rae
The Minister stated that registered nurses were now more than $36,000 better off annually, and enrolled nurses almost $32,000 better off, compared to 2022. He noted the government had invested nearly $18 billion in aged-care wages over four years, addressing undervaluation determined by the Fair Work Commission. He argued that better pay improved care quality and countered opposition criticism by affirming that hiring nurses and funding pay rises were positive outcomes.
Question from Cameron Caldwell
The member asked whether the government would support the coalition's bill to ensure human oversight of all aged care decisions, citing the tragic case of Mr Austin whose application was reviewed by an AI tool.
Background: A 98-year-old constituent, Mr Austin, died after his aged care application was assessed as low priority by an automated tool, despite a recent fall.
Answer from Sam Rae
The minister expressed condolences to the family and stated that no one in parliament wants older Australians to die waiting for care. He highlighted that wait times have decreased significantly, with standard priority cases waiting three months less and urgent cases receiving funding within a month. The minister firmly denied the use of artificial intelligence in the assessment system, clarifying that qualified human assessors conduct clinical evaluations which are then processed by an integrated tool to apply rules fairly. He noted that the government has made significant investments to overhaul the aged care system since 2022.
Question from Angus Taylor
The member asked why the government would not support the coalition's bill for human oversight, citing long wait times and the Senate's passage of the bill.
Background: The Senate passed a coalition bill for human oversight of aged care decisions, which the government opposed.
Answer from Anthony Albanese; Sam Rae
The Prime Minister stated that the premise of the question was incorrect as human oversight already exists, and criticized the opposition for hypocrisy given their past record. The Minister for Aged Care clarified that assessments are conducted by qualified humans and that the government shares the intent of the private senator's bill but fears it would lead to inconsistent decisions and longer wait times. The minister announced a new legislated escalation pathway allowing the department secretary to adjust assessments in extenuating circumstances, with consultations planned during the parliamentary break.
Question from Anne Stanley
The member asked for details on the government's progress in rebuilding the aged care workforce and the necessity of these actions.
Background: The member asked about progress in repairing the aged care workforce and why this was necessary after a decade of neglect.
Answer from Sam Rae
The Minister said the government had put nearly $18 billion into raising pay for aged care staff. From 1 July, registered nurses would get an extra $85 weekly, enrolled nurses $67, and personal care workers $59. She noted that the average registered nurse was already more than $28,000 better off per year under the government. The Minister highlighted that another wage increase for nurses would occur on 1 August, emphasizing that supporting workers was essential for a strong aged care system.
Question from Darren Chester
The member asked for the number of older Australians who had died while waiting for home care packages since 2022.
Background: The member asked how many older Australians had died while waiting for home care packages since the government took office in 2022.
Answer from Sam Rae
The Minister stated that at the peak of the crisis around 2018, more than 16,000 older Australians died on the waiting list each year. She noted that the number had significantly reduced, with 4,812 Australians dying on the list in the last financial year. The Minister highlighted that wait times had decreased, with standard-priority cases waiting three months less and high-priority cases waiting one to two months. She stated that $47 billion was invested in aged care for the next year, including 32,000 new Support at Home places.
Question from Monique Ryan
The member asked how the Minister could justify the integrated assessment tool to Australians like her constituent Graham Crossan, who needs 24-hour care but was denied the highest level of support.
Background: The Independent member for Kooyong questioned the Minister for Aged Care about the assessment of a constituent with motor neurone disease.
Answer from Sam Rae
The Minister declined to discuss specific case details due to privacy but confirmed familiarity with the situation. She stated that the government has amended aged-care rules to recognize MND as a condition warranting urgent priority under Support at Home. This change applies retrospectively, prioritizing access for those already assessed or waiting. She offered to meet with the member and the family to discuss the specific case further.
Question from Darren Chester
The member asked if the minister took responsibility for the 4,800 eligible older Australians who died waiting for home care in the past year.
Background: Reports indicated older Australians were dying while waiting for Support at Home packages.
Answer from Sam Rae
The Minister expressed distress at the deaths and noted the Royal Commission's recommendations had led to the new Support at Home program. He cited a report showing decreasing waiting times and affirmed the government's commitment to reducing wait times further.
Question from Rebekha Sharkie
The member asked what it takes for a dying person to receive support at home, citing a case of a constituent waiting for a package.
Background: A constituent with motor neurone disease was assessed as medium priority for a Support at Home package despite having limited time to live.
Answer from Sam Rae
The Minister stated that 364,723 older Australians have access to Support at Home places, with 83,000 additional places being delivered this financial year and 32,000 next year. He noted that wait times have decreased across all priorities since the program began, and urgent cases receive funding within a month. He confirmed that additional funding has been allocated to review the prioritisation mechanism to ensure people like the constituent receive care.
Question from Emma Comer
The member asked how the budget was building Australia's future through historic investment in aged care.
Background: A government member asked the Minister for Aged Care how the budget was building Australia's future through investment in aged care.
Answer from Sam Rae
The Minister stated that the budget included a significant boost to residential aged care, building on more than $1 billion invested since 2022. She highlighted the delivery of 5,000 real beds every year. The Minister noted that Stolen Generations redress payments would no longer be counted in means assessments. She mentioned that no older Australian in the Support at Home program would incur costs for assistance with bathing, getting dressed, or managing incontinence, and that end-of-life care would be extended.
Question from Helen Haines
The member asked whether the long wait times for home support services were acceptable and how the government intended to fix them, citing specific constituents.
Background: The member cited specific cases of elderly residents in her electorate facing long delays for home support services and asked if these delays were acceptable.
Answer from Sam Rae
The Minister acknowledged the correspondence and noted that demand had increased significantly, with over 350,000 Australians receiving care under the Support at Home program. An additional 83,000 places were being allocated this financial year to reduce wait times. Ninety-nine per cent of people on the national priority system were eligible for some support while waiting, and urgent cases were funded within a month. The waitlist had dropped by more than 25,000 people since September 2025. The budget would remove co-contributions for personal care services and invest in residential care sustainability.
Question from Rebekha Sharkie
The member asked if the minister believed completing just two reviews over a seven-week period was acceptable.
Background: Senate estimates revealed only two of 414 Support at Home package appeals were reviewed in seven weeks.
Answer from Sam Rae
The Minister stated that all assessments were completed by qualified human assessors with clinical input. He noted that 180,000 assessments had been completed since November, with less than half a per cent requesting a review. He emphasized that the new system had reduced median assessment times to under a month, compared to up to 10 months under the previous system, and had eliminated $4 billion in unspent funds.
Question from Kevin Hogan
The member asked what the minister's plan was to ensure rising fuel costs did not result in the loss of essential community transport services for vulnerable people.
Background: The Deputy Leader of the Nationals asked the Minister for Aged Care and Seniors about the impact of rising fuel costs on community transport providers in his electorate.
Answer from Sam Rae
The minister stated that Australia was fuel secure and that the government was monitoring the impact of prices on aged-care providers. He noted that providers could access help via current aged-care business and viability assistance, including the Market Adjustment Program, dedicated First Nations support programs, and business and workforce advisory services. He emphasized that there was no fuel shortage, only localized disruption due to demand spikes, and that the government stood ready to support providers.
Question from David Smith
The member asked how the government was implementing significant aged-care reforms to address past neglect.
Background: A government member asked the Minister for Aged Care and Seniors how the government was delivering meaningful aged-care reforms after a decade of neglect.
Answer from Sam Rae
The Minister highlighted the introduction of the new Aged Care Act with a statement of rights, effective November 1 last year. He noted the delivery of Support at Home with 83,000 additional home-care places and the direct allocation of aged-care places to individuals. The Minister announced $115 million in new funding for beds in hotspots, bringing total ACCAP investment to over $1 billion since 2022. He emphasized four rounds of fully funded pay rises for aged-care workers, increasing average registered nurse earnings by $28,000 annually. He contrasted these actions with the previous government's inaction.
Question from Dai Le
The member asked whether the Minister would urgently review transition cases and set maximum wait times for home care packages to prevent seniors from being left without support during reforms.
Background: Seniors approved for home care are stuck in queues due to provider capacity.
Answer from Sam Rae
The Minister highlighted that aged care funding has increased by over 40 per cent since 2022 and that the new Support at Home program now serves nearly 350,000 Australians. He noted that 83,000 additional places are being rolled out this financial year, which has reduced the National Priority System queue by over 25,000 people. He reported that the median period for home support assessments fell by seven days between the April-June and July-September 2025 quarters, with comprehensive assessments now taking under a month. The Minister emphasized the new Aged Care Act's sustainable funding model.
Question from Luke Gosling
The member asked how the government was delivering for aged-care workers and residents, why this was necessary, and how it differed from other approaches.
Background: The government was implementing reforms to the aged care sector.
Answer from Sam Rae
The Minister highlighted a $60 million investment in a new facility in Palmerston and four rounds of fully funded pay rises, increasing average registered nurse wages by $28,000 annually. He noted the mandate for 24/7 registered nurse presence and mandatory care minutes. He contrasted this with the previous government's failure to implement Royal Commission recommendations and their plans to cut public sector jobs.
Question from Fiona Phillips
The member asked how changes to bulk-billing were delivering better health outcomes for older Australians and why this was necessary.
Background: The member sought to highlight health care improvements for seniors.
Answer from Sam Rae
The minister stated that bulk-billing for over-64s was now over 88 per cent, with 32 fully bulk-billing clinics in the member's community. He noted that 96 per cent of older Australians lived within 20 minutes of a bulk-billing GP. The minister highlighted PBS medicine cost caps, with concession card holders paying $7.70 and an annual cap of $277. He also mentioned $25 billion in extra hospital funding and the opening of 137 urgent care clinics.
Question from Libby Coker
The member asked how the government was delivering real reform in aged care and why these reforms were necessary.
Background: The new Aged Care Act had been in effect for 100 days.
Answer from Sam Rae
The Minister reported that 346,893 older people had been allocated Support at Home places, and the National Priority System had dropped by almost 30,000 people. Median assessment wait times had decreased by eight days to 24 days. He highlighted $18 billion in pay rises for aged care workers. He contrasted this delivery with the opposition's internal divisions and previous neglect of the sector.
Question from Monique Ryan
The member asked if the reforms were 'robo aged care' given reports of 120,000 Australians waiting for automated assessments.
Background: Constituents reported long wait times and concerns about algorithmic decision-making in the new single assessment scheme.
Answer from Sam Rae
The Minister said that in the July-September 2025 quarter, the median period for home assessments fell by seven days and comprehensive ones by eight. He noted that the integrated assessment tool aids assessors without substituting clinical judgement. He confirmed that the algorithm depends on assessor input and will be updated regularly using feedback.
Question from Luke Gosling
The member asked how the government was delivering well-paid jobs for aged-care workers and improving care for older Australians.
Background: The government is investing in aged care infrastructure and worker wages.
Answer from Sam Rae
The Minister announced a new 120- to 150-bed aged-care home in Palmerston, part of almost $1 billion invested since 2022. He highlighted wage increases for aged-care workers, with registered nurses earning $28,000 more annually. He also mentioned free TAFE and paid prac programs to build the workforce, emphasizing the government's focus on delivery and worker support.
Question from Dan Repacholi
The member asked what the government had done to repair the aged-care workforce and why this was necessary.
Background: The aged care sector had faced neglect. The question sought to outline government actions to rebuild the workforce.
Answer from Sam Rae
The minister stated that the government had delivered four rounds of fully funded pay rises, increasing the average registered nurse's pay by $28,000. He highlighted the introduction of 24/7 nursing requirements, mandatory care minutes, and free TAFE places for aged care workers. He criticized the previous government for neglecting the sector.
Question from Joanne Ryan
The member asked how the aged care reforms were delivering care for older Australians that was safer, fairer, and more dignified, and why these reforms were critical.
Background: The government had implemented new aged care reforms, including the Aged Care Act and the Support at Home program, aimed at providing safer and more dignified care.
Answer from Sam Rae
The minister stated that the new Aged Care Act enshrined rights for older Australians, including dignity, choice, and freedom from abuse. The Support at Home program offered higher levels of care with less red tape. Residential care standards were strengthened with mandatory staffing levels. He noted that the transition had gone smoothly, with ICT system updates operationalizing the reforms. He emphasized that these changes addressed nine years of neglect under the previous government.
Question from Rebekha Sharkie
The member asked if the minister would look at bringing forward price capping for aged care services.
Background: Home-care providers in the member's electorate were increasing fees by 40 to 100 per cent.
Answer from Sam Rae
The minister stated that from Saturday, administration prices under the new Support at Home program would be capped at 10 per cent. He noted that the independent pricing authority had issued pricing guidance and would introduce full pricing caps from July 2026.
Question from Justine Elliot
The member asked how the government is reforming the aged care system to improve quality and why reform was necessary.
Background: The question aimed to highlight the government's aged care reforms and the previous system's failures.
Answer from Sam Rae
The Minister stated that the new Aged Care Act commences on 1 November, but reforms began earlier with the release of over 10,000 fast-tracked home-care packages, aiming for 83,000 new places this financial year. He highlighted a $300 million investment in the Aged Care Capital Assistance Program and pay rises for aged care workers, with registered nurses earning an average of $28,000 more annually. He criticized the previous government for inheriting a system in crisis, citing the royal commission's findings, and affirmed the government's commitment to dignified care.
Question from Fiona Phillips
The member asked how the government's generational reforms were rebuilding the aged-care system and delivering better care.
Background: The government was implementing new aged care reforms.
Answer from Sam Rae
The minister announced that the new Aged Care Act and Support at Home program would commence on 1 November. He noted that 20,000 additional homecare packages would be fast-tracked in the eight weeks leading up to this date, with a further 63,000 packages to be rolled out by June 2026. He highlighted existing reforms, including mandated 24/7 registered nursing, which had delivered over 6.8 million additional minutes of care daily. He also mentioned a $17.7 billion investment to increase aged-care worker wages.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked whether the minister was aware that the Prime Minister had deliberately excluded him from negotiations regarding aged care reforms. She queried why elderly Australians should trust the government if the relevant minister was not present for significant decisions.
Background: The coalition had secured an agreement in the Senate for the delivery of 83,000 home-care package places, including 40,000 in the current year. The opposition leader questioned why the Prime Minister excluded the Minister for Aged Care from these negotiations.
Answer from Sam Rae
The minister stated that the government had agreed to pass the aged care bill, ensuring certainty for older Australians, providers, and workers. He explained that the new Support at Home program would allow more seniors to remain at home with higher levels of care. To meet increased demand, the government would fast-track the release of an extra 20,000 home care packages in the eight weeks leading up to 1 November. The remaining 63,000 packages would be allocated by 30 June 2026, maintaining fiscal prudence while delivering care faster.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked when the minister or his office became aware of the increased waitlist figure of nearly 109,000 people. She questioned why this updated number had not been provided to the House.
Background: The government had previously cited a waitlist of around 87,000 people as of 31 March. Recent Senate statements indicated the waitlist had grown to nearly 109,000 by 31 July.
Answer from Sam Rae
The minister explained that there is an established process for verifying data regarding the national priority system waitlist. He confirmed that around 87,000 people were on the waitlist at the end of March and that the government releases more than 2,000 home-care packages weekly. He stated that the verification process is longstanding and consistent with previous government practices to ensure incorrect information is not released.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked whether the delay in rolling out home-care packages was a decision made by the minister, the Minister for Health and Ageing, or endorsed by the cabinet.
Background: The Minister for Aged Care and Seniors had provided conflicting explanations for delays in delivering 83,000 home-care packages, citing the sector, elderly Australians, and legislation.
Answer from Sam Rae
The minister stated that the reforms were bipartisan decisions made by the previous parliament. He explained that the Support at Home program would commence on 1 November 2025, releasing over 80,000 new places in its first year. He noted that more than 2,000 packages were currently released weekly, with high-priority cases receiving care within a month. The deferral of the Aged Care Act was described as necessary to ensure providers and older Australians were prepared for the reforms.
Question from Zoe McKenzie
The member asked if the minister believed Australians like her constituent were responsible for the delay in delivering 83,000 home-care packages.
Background: An 85-year-old constituent registered for an aged-care assessment in March 2025 but was told assessment would not occur until early next year, despite being on an urgent list.
Answer from Sam Rae
The minister offered to follow up on the specific case after question time. He explained that the new single streamlined assessment process, aligned with royal commission recommendations, aims to reduce wait times. He stated that the median wait time for an assessment was currently 25 days and continuing to reduce. He clarified that the assessment waitlist includes those seeking lower-level care and overlaps with the national priority system, noting that over 521,000 assessments were completed last year.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked how many elderly Australians had died waiting for a home-care package since the minister was sworn in on 13 May.
Background: The Prime Minister had previously stated that older Australians should not die waiting for home-care packages.
Answer from Sam Rae
The minister expressed sadness at any deaths and reiterated that the deferral of the Aged Care Act was made after extensive consultation to ensure care quality. He quoted a media release from the shadow minister for health and aged care, Senator Ruston, which welcomed the delay as the right decision for older Australians and providers.
Question from Angie Bell
The member asked how many older Australians had passed away while awaiting a home-care package from 13 May.
Background: The member asked about deaths among those waiting for home-care packages.
Answer from Sam Rae
The minister reiterated that the deferral was welcomed by the sector and quoted support from Silverchain and Ageing Australia. He stated that in the last financial year, 4,812 older Australians died while in care or waiting for care, a figure provided by the department to the Senate.
Question from Phillip Thompson
The member asked when the minister would apologise to families of vulnerable elderly people who died waiting for care.
Background: A National Seniors Australia director cited cases of elderly people dying after being released from hospital without support.
Answer from Sam Rae
The minister expressed sadness at the deaths and reiterated that the deferral of the new act was broadly welcomed. He referred the member to his previous answers regarding the decision-making process and sector feedback.
Question from Simon Kennedy
The member asked the minister to confirm if the statistic linking long wait times to higher death rates was true.
Background: A submission stated that waiting over six months for a home-care package increased the chance of death by 18 per cent.
Answer from Sam Rae
The minister stated he had canvassed these matters extensively and referred the member to his previous answers.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked how many of the promised 83,000 home-care packages had been delivered to date.
Background: The government had pledged to provide 83,000 new home-care packages under the Support at Home program.
Answer from Sam Rae
The minister explained that the Support at Home program, established under the new Aged Care Act, would commence on 1 November. He noted that home-care demand had grown from 155,000 to over 300,000 recipients since 2020. The minister stated that 83,000 additional packages would be delivered in the first 12 months of the new program, on top of existing recipients. Until November, the government continued to allocate an average of more than 2,000 packages weekly, with high-priority cases receiving care within a month.
Question from Sussan Ley
The member asked if the minister would apologise to elderly Australians and their families for the alleged betrayal regarding the delay in package delivery.
Background: Critics claimed zero promised packages had been delivered while over 200,000 Australians waited for care or assessments.
Answer from Sam Rae
The minister clarified that the Support at Home program could only begin once the legislation came into effect on 1 November. He reiterated that packages continued to be allocated weekly at an average of over 2,000, with high-priority assessments receiving care within a month. The minister emphasized that the new program would deliver 83,000 additional packages from November, supporting the more than 300,000 Australians already receiving care.
Question from Helen Haines
The member asked if the government would release 20,000 new home-care places immediately to prevent waitlists from growing.
Background: Department data showed over 120,000 people waiting for assessments and 87,000 for packages, with no new plans beyond attrition.
Answer from Sam Rae
The minister stated that the Support at Home program would commence on 1 November, providing the legislative framework for new packages. He noted that 87,597 people were on the national priority system waitlist as of 31 March, with over 2,000 packages allocated weekly. The minister explained that assessment wait times were longer than desired but that 521,000 assessments were completed last year. He clarified that 99 per cent of those waiting for packages were already receiving some level of care, and the median assessment wait time was 25 days.
Question from Tom Venning
The member asked if the minister would expedite the delivery of this specific man's package as an immediate priority.
Background: A constituent with Parkinson's disease faced a 12-month wait for a home-care package, forcing his daughter to quit her job.
Answer from Sam Rae
The minister offered to personally follow up on the case if the member provided details. He reiterated that the Support at Home program would deliver over 80,000 new places from 1 November. Until then, more than 2,000 packages were allocated weekly, with high-priority cases receiving care within a month. The minister defended the delay as necessary to ensure the new system was fully ready for older Australians.
Question from Llew O'Brien
The member asked if the minister would apologise to the families of those who died and how many more would die waiting for the rollout to commence.
Background: Almost 5,000 elderly Australians had died while on waiting lists for home-care packages in the past year.
Answer from Sam Rae
The minister expressed sadness at the loss of older Australians and offered condolences to their families. He explained that the deferral to 1 November was due to legislative requirements for the Support at Home program. From November, the government would deliver 83,000 additional packages while continuing to support the 300,000 Australians currently receiving care.
Question from Melissa McIntosh
The member asked why the government was blaming the sector for delays when providers claimed they were ready.
Background: Aged-care providers had told a Senate inquiry they had capacity to take on more patients immediately.
Answer from Sam Rae
The minister acknowledged that some providers were enthusiastic but stated that the government wanted to minimize disruption for older people during the system-wide reform. He emphasized that work was ongoing until 1 November to ensure the new system worked effectively for older Australians.
Question from Alex Hawke
The member asked why the government had misled Australians by promising a 1 July start date if the legislation did not allow for it.
Background: The government had promised 83,000 packages by 1 July but delayed the rollout to 1 November.
Answer from Sam Rae
The minister explained that the implementation of the new Aged Care Act was originally scheduled for 1 July. However, based on feedback from older people and the sector, the government decided to defer implementation to 1 November to ensure a smooth transition. He reiterated that 83,000 additional packages would be delivered in the first 12 months of the Support at Home program from November.
Question from Anne Webster
The member asked if the minister could identify a single provider or elderly person who personally requested the delay.
Background: The minister had claimed the sector and elderly Australians requested the delay in package rollout.
Answer from Sam Rae
The minister stated that he had spoken to many older people, families, providers, and workers since becoming minister. He claimed the overwhelming response from all groups was that a brief deferral was needed to ensure a smooth implementation of the new aged care act. He reiterated that the Support at Home program relied on the legislative framework coming into effect on 1 November.
Question from Rebekha Sharkie
The member asked if the government was deliberately slowing assessments to hide the reality of 200,000 people waiting up to two years.
Background: Department data showed 120,000 people waiting for assessments and 100,000 for packages, with waits up to 12 months.
Answer from Sam Rae
The minister denied deliberately slowing assessments, stating that a new single assessment system was being rolled out to reduce wait times. He acknowledged that wait times were longer than desired but noted that 521,000 assessments were completed last year. He explained that the waitlist included duplication and that 99 per cent of those waiting for packages were already receiving some level of care. The minister emphasized that reforms were complex and required a smooth transition.
Question from Rebekha Sharkie
The member asked the Minister for Aged Care to justify delaying additional home-care packages from July to November, given the growing waitlist and deaths among those waiting.
Background: The number of older Australians waiting for home care had risen from 87,597 in March to over 100,000, with a delay in new packages from July to November.
Answer from Sam Rae
The Minister explained that the delay allowed for the implementation of the new Aged Care Act and the Support at Home program on 1 November, which replaced the existing Home Care Packages. He noted that demand had grown significantly, with over 300,000 people accessing care compared to 150,000 in 2020. He assured that 80,000 additional places would roll out in the first 12 months of the new program. Until then, packages would continue to be assigned weekly, with high-priority cases receiving care within a month.
Question from Helen Haines
The member asked what the government was doing to support nearly 90,000 people waiting for home-care packages, given the delay to the new system and the decision not to fund 20,000 bridging packages.
Background: An independent member asked the Minister for Aged Care about the delay to the new aged care system and the lack of funding for bridging packages for those waiting.
Answer from Sam Rae
The minister explained that the deferral until 1 November was to ensure operational and legislative readiness for the Support at Home program. He noted that over 300,000 Australians currently access home-care packages, with spending exceeding $8 billion last year. He confirmed that high-priority individuals would continue to receive packages within a month. He stated that 80,000 additional packages would be rolled out in the first 12 months of the new system.
Question from Basem Abdo
The member asked how the government was delivering on its commitment to fix aged care and ensure dignity for older Australians.
Background: A government member asked the Minister for Aged Care and Seniors about delivering on promises to repair the aged care sector.
Answer from Sam Rae
The Minister highlighted the introduction of legislation to implement the Aged Care Act 2024, delivering 58 royal commission recommendations. He noted that 24/7 nursing is now mandated, with registered nurses onsite 99 per cent of the time, and an additional 6.8 million care minutes delivered daily. He cited $17.7 billion invested in worker wages, resulting in weekly pay increases for nurses and care workers, and noted that three-quarters of homes now have four or five-star ratings.
Other Parliamentary Activity
-
Aged Care Legislation Amendment (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Aged Care Commissioner and Other Measures) Bill 2026; Consideration in Detail
House of Representatives · Thursday 17 September 2026 · Consideration in Detail
Opened this debate
-
Customs Amendment (Safeguard Inquiries) Bill 2026; Third Reading
House of Representatives · Thursday 17 September 2026 · Third Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
Aged Care Legislation Amendment (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Aged Care Commissioner and Other Measures) Bill 2026; Third Reading
House of Representatives · Thursday 17 September 2026 · Third Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
Aged Care Legislation Amendment (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Aged Care Commissioner and Other Measures) Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 9 September 2026 · Second Reading
Responded as minister
-
Aged Care Legislation Amendment (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Aged Care Commissioner and Other Measures) Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 1 July 2026 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Senior Australians
House of Representatives · Tuesday 30 June 2026 · Matter of Public Importance
Responded as minister
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026, Income Tax Rates Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026; Reference to Committee
House of Representatives · Thursday 28 May 2026 · Reference to Committee
Responded as minister
-
Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025; Consideration of Senate Message
House of Representatives · Thursday 4 September 2025 · Consideration of Senate Message
Opened this debate
-
Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025; Third Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 30 July 2025 · Third Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
Aged Care (Accommodation Payment Security) Levy Amendment Bill 2025; Third Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 30 July 2025 · Third Reading
Contributed to this debate
-
Aged Care and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Thursday 24 July 2025 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Aged Care (Accommodation Payment Security) Levy Amendment Bill 2025; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Thursday 24 July 2025 · Second Reading
Opened this debate
-
Customs Amendment (Expedited Seizure and Disposal of Engineered Stone) Bill 2024; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 12 February 2025 · Second Reading
Contributed to this debate · Position: support
-
Victoria: Bushfires
House of Representatives · Monday 10 February 2025 · General Debate
Contributed to this debate · Position: mixed
- Votes recorded
- 251
- Aye votes (53.0%)
- 133
- No votes (47.0%)
- 118
Showing the latest 50 votes.
-
Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Amendment (Veterans' Healthcare With...
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 85, Noes 40 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Rearrangement
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 42, Noes 87 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Suspension of Standing and Sessional Orders
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 42, Noes 89 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Suspension of Standing and Sessional Orders
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 85, Noes 44 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 88, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 87, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 9, Noes 85 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 86, Noes 47 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 45, Noes 87 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Rearrangement
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 84, Noes 13 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Rearrangement
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 49, Noes 87 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Consideration of Legislation
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 43, Noes 87 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; Consideration of Senate Message
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 95, Noes 43 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; Consideration of Senate Message
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 95, Noes 42 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Albanese Government; Attempted Censure
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 46, Noes 86 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Statute Update Bill 2026; Consideration of Senate Message
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 84, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Universal Outdoor Mobile Obligation...
9 Sep 2026 · Ayes 52, Noes 86 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Gun Control
9 Sep 2026 · Ayes 88, Noes 47 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Veterans
7 Sep 2026 · Ayes 88, Noes 49 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Cash Distribution Framework Bill 2026; Consideration of Senate Message
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 84, Noes 34 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Economy
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 41, Noes 85 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026; Considerati...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 36 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment Bill 2026; Report from Federation Cha...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 39, Noes 90 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Australia's Foreign Relations (State and Territory Arrangements) Amendment Bi...
19 Aug 2026 · Ayes 38, Noes 80 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Combatting Illicit Tobacco Bill 2026; Report from Federation Chamber
19 Aug 2026 · Ayes 41, Noes 84 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Minister for Veterans' Affairs
19 Aug 2026 · Ayes 83, Noes 44 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
News Journalism Payments Bill 2026; Second Reading
19 Aug 2026 · Ayes 40, Noes 83 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026; Consideration in ...
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 33, Noes 95 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026; Second Reading
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 12, Noes 86 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026; Second Reading
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 12, Noes 85 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 87, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Minister for Veterans' Affairs and Defence Personnel; Attempted Censure
17 Aug 2026 · Ayes 86, Noes 43 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Cash Distribution Framework Bill 2026; Reference to Federation Chamber
12 Aug 2026 · Ayes 40, Noes 83 · Failed
VOTED NO -
International Relations: Australia and Japan
12 Aug 2026 · Ayes 88, Noes 41 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Aged Care Amendment (Restoring Human Override for Aged Care Needs Assessments...
11 Aug 2026 · Ayes 42, Noes 87 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Rearrangement
11 Aug 2026 · Ayes 86, Noes 47 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Rearrangement
2 Jul 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 42 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Minister for Defence Industry; Attempted Censure
2 Jul 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 41 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Health Insurance Amendment (Incentive Payments and Other Measures) Bill 2026;...
2 Jul 2026 · Ayes 39, Noes 92 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Joint Committee; Appointment
2 Jul 2026 · Ayes 38, Noes 101 · Failed
VOTED NO -
National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future ...
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 33 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Health Legislation Amendment (Prescribing of Pharmaceutical Benefits) Bill 20...
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 43 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Health Legislation Amendment (Prescribing of Pharmaceutical Benefits) Bill 20...
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 43 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future ...
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 10, Noes 66 · Failed
VOTED NO -
National Anti-Corruption Commission Joint Committee; Consideration of Senate ...
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 93, Noes 45 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Member for Groom
30 Jun 2026 · Ayes 102, Noes 33 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Reporting System Reform) Bill 2026; Consid...
30 Jun 2026 · Ayes 98, Noes 40 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Reporting System Reform) Bill 2026; Consid...
30 Jun 2026 · Ayes 91, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Albanese Government
30 Jun 2026 · Ayes 91, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Workplace Relations Legislation Amendment (Building Cooperative Workplaces No...
30 Jun 2026 · Ayes 97, Noes 42 · Passed
VOTED AYE
About this page
This page tracks Sam Rae's parliamentary activity: questions asked and answered in Question Time, debates spoken in, and votes in divisions. Summaries are in reported speech, not transcripts; each one links to the official record.