Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Limitation of Debate

Treasury Laws Amendment (Supporting Choice in Superannuation and Other Measures) Bill 2025; Limitation of Debate

Senate · Monday 23 March 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The Senate debated the Treasury Laws Amendment (Supporting Choice in Superannuation and Other Measures) Bill 2025 after the time allotted for debate expired. Maria Kovacic moved the question on several opposition amendments, which were subsequently negated by a division. Independent senators Tammy Tyrrell and David Pocock expressed support for amendments regarding reviews and guidance, while Fatima Payman recorded opposition to an amendment concerning stapled fund requests. The bill was ultimately agreed to and reported without amendment.

Outcome

The amendments were negated by a division of 24 to 33, and the bill was agreed to and reported without amendment.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Maria Kovacic (NSW) (Liberal Party) Liberal

Kovacic noted that the time for debate had expired and moved the question on the remaining opposition amendments. Kovacic clarified that One Nation amendments identical to those previously negated would not be put to the vote. Kovacic listed the specific amendments located on pages 3681, 3686, 3688, 3689, 3691, and 3693 for consideration. These amendments addressed issues such as stapled fund notifications, review requirements, advertising exceptions, commencement dates, annual reporting, and regulatory guidance.

Votes during this debate

Division 10: Treasury Laws Amendment (Supporting Choice in Superannuation and Other Measures) Bill 2025; Limitation of Debate Not passed 24–33