Clare O'Neil
Australian Labor Party Member for Hotham
Currently sitting
Photo: Yu Chu Chin, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Seat and party history (1)
- Australian Labor Party - Hotham (House) - 7 Sep 2013 to present
- Seat and party records: OpenAustralia member data.
Contact
Electorate office: (03) 9545 6211
17-19 Atherton Road, Oakleigh VIC 3166
Office details: Parliament of Australia, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
Contact details on aph.gov.au Profile on OpenAustraliaNot sure if this is your member? Find your electorate (AEC)
These counts cover what is on this site only. They do not measure electorate work or committee work.
Compared with other members
Clare O'Neil compared with all 150 sitting House members.
Questions asked in Question Time
Lower than 81% of House members- This member
- 0
- Average
- 11.2
- Median
- 12
Debates spoken in
Lower than 99% of House members- This member
- 3
- Average
- 35.9
- Median
- 30.5
Votes cast
Lower than 63% of House members- This member
- 233
- Average
- 253.0
- Median
- 265
Share of divisions voted in
Lower than 67% of House members- This member
- 70%
- Average
- 79%
- Median
- 81%
Read these with care
- The median is the middle member: half did more, half did less. It is less affected by a few very active members than the average.
- Ministers answer questions rather than ask them, and the presiding officers rarely vote, so their patterns differ.
- Government backbenchers are often given arranged "Dorothy Dixer" questions, which raises their question counts.
- Votes only record ayes and noes, so a missed vote cannot be told apart from a pair (an agreed absence).
- Counts cover only what is on this site, and do not measure electorate or committee work. New members have less history.
Question Time
No questions recorded for this member.
Question from Jamie Chaffey
The member asked if the minister was aware of the decline in new home sales and construction insolvencies, and where Australians would live if builders continued to fail.
Background: A report indicated a 20 per cent drop in new home sales and a record number of construction business insolvencies.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The minister stated that the government had delivered a pro-supply budget supporting up to 30,000 additional homes over the next decade. She cited Budget Paper No. 1 and ABS data showing that new investor loans for new builds were at record highs, with a 27.5 per cent increase. She noted that housing approvals had risen 9.1 per cent for the third consecutive year, contrasting this with the 21 per cent fall in approvals under the previous government.
Question from Trish Cook
The member asked how the government's investment in social and affordable housing was impacting Australians' lives and whether there were any risks to the delivery of these homes.
Background: The government had been investing in social and affordable housing to address the housing crisis.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The minister shared the story of a single mother and victim of domestic violence who had moved into a new government-built home, providing her family with safety and stability after multiple moves. She announced $300 million in new funding for crisis and transitional housing, completing a total $1.2 billion investment package aimed at supporting 19,000 vulnerable Australians. She emphasised the importance of stable housing for young people experiencing homelessness, citing the positive impact on individuals like Sienna, who had attended a press conference to discuss her experience.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked whether the government acknowledged that its policies had failed to deliver sufficient housing supply, resulting in higher rents and a projected deficit of at least 330,000 homes against its targets.
Background: The member challenged the government on its housing performance, citing high rents and a predicted shortfall in construction targets.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The minister stated that the government had implemented the largest housing agenda since the postwar period, focusing on building more homes, assisting renters, and promoting homeownership. She claimed supply measures would result in an additional 400,000 homes, including 55,000 social and affordable homes, contrasting this with the previous government's record of building only 373 homes in nine years. The minister highlighted that Commonwealth rent assistance had been raised twice above legislated increases and noted that 270,000 first-home buyers had accessed the five per cent deposit scheme. She argued that recent tax changes would reverse the decline in homeownership rates.
Question from Trish Cook
The member asked how the government was helping Australians achieve homeownership and whether there were any risks to this approach.
Background: The member asked about government efforts to help Australians achieve homeownership and any associated risks.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The minister highlighted the five per cent deposit scheme and housing tax reforms that had supported 270,000 first-home buyers. She criticized opposition and One Nation proposals to allow superannuation withdrawals for housing, arguing these policies would increase costs and lead to more Australians retiring into poverty. She stated that the government's approach protected retirement savings while helping people buy homes, ensuring Australians did not have to choose between current security and future dignity.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked whether the Minister still supported Treasury's prediction that property prices would fall by only two per cent, given reports of a significant market crash.
Background: The member claimed Sydney house prices were plummeting and questioned the transparency of government modelling.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister confirmed that house prices were softening, noting this was the fourth such occurrence in a decade. She cited the federal budget fact sheet, which stated Treasury modelling predicted a small, temporary slowing in price growth, estimated at around two per cent less over a couple of years compared to no policy change. She argued this would lead to 75,000 more people owning their homes in the coming ten years. She contextualised current trends by noting house prices had grown by 400 per cent over the previous 25 years and almost doubled in Sydney during the previous nine years of Coalition government.
Question from Trish Cook
The member asked how the government was delivering safe homes for those in need and if there were risks to this delivery.
Background: The member asked about the delivery of safe and secure homes for Australians in need.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister highlighted the construction of 19 new social homes in the member's electorate and the recent announcement of $600 million for approximately 1,000 new crisis homes. She noted that the funding was split between supporting women and children fleeing family violence and young people at risk of homelessness. The Minister emphasized the importance of stable housing for safety and stability. She affirmed that the government was making progress in delivering real change to the housing situation.
Question from Melissa McIntosh
The member asked whether the minister was proud of policies that allegedly caused rental surges, referencing a specific forecast from a property manager and the minister's prior statements on tax reform.
Background: The member cited a claim by Ray White that rents could rise by 30 per cent due to government tax policies, contrasting this with the minister's previous comments on capital gains tax.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The minister rejected the premise, stating that Ray White had explicitly clarified they were not forecasting a 30 per cent rent rise. She noted that the opposition had previously misquoted the National Australia Bank on similar issues. The minister argued that the government had decades of advocacy for renters and was implementing comprehensive reforms to support them, including building more homes and improving rental standards, while accusing the opposition of defending a broken system.
Question from Ali France
The member asked how housing tax reforms were helping Australians and what policies would make it harder to secure housing.
Background: The member asked about the impact of housing tax reforms and what approaches would hinder housing access.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The minister stated that reforms aimed to help first home buyers and encourage new home building. She cited data showing a 27 per cent increase in investor lending for new dwellings and a 15 per cent drop in lending for existing homes. She quoted banking executives supporting the reforms and argued that the opposition's policies would defend a broken system, whereas the government was addressing housing insecurity for young people.
Question from Rebekha Sharkie
The member asked why the government allowed non-citizens to access the five per cent deposit scheme, contrasting this with HECS debt rules.
Background: The member cited reports that 51,000 non-citizens had accessed the five per cent deposit scheme, questioning the risk to Australian citizens.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The minister clarified that only citizens and permanent residents were eligible, not temporary residents. She argued that permanent residents were valuable contributors to the workforce and community. She criticized the Leader of the Opposition for making false claims about eligibility and stated that 260,000 people had accessed the scheme, emphasizing the government's commitment to housing affordability.
Question from Angie Bell
The member questioned whether the Minister felt pride in causing millions of Australians to face higher rental costs, citing her earlier remarks on capital gains tax and negative gearing.
Background: The Minister for Housing had previously expressed pride in tax reforms, which the opposition linked to rising rents.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister described the housing crisis as a result of 40 years of policy failures, noting 400 per cent house price growth over 25 years. She criticized the opposition for not raising Commonwealth Rent Assistance or addressing rental standards during their nine years in office. She argued that the government's policies were designed to help renters achieve homeownership and that the opposition's approach would create an unfair market.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked if the Minister would guarantee rents would not go up by 30 per cent due to Labor's tax changes, citing the rise in median rents.
Background: Median capital city rents had risen from $470 to $690 per week, and the opposition claimed tax changes would cause a 30 per cent increase.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister referred to the Prime Minister's clarification regarding the National Australia Bank's statement. She stated that Treasury advice indicated a negligible impact on rents because existing landlords were grandfathered. She highlighted that the government had lifted Commonwealth Rent Assistance by 50 per cent, negotiated improved rental standards, and aimed to help 75,000 renters enter homeownership. She quoted an advocacy group stating that investor tax breaks had fueled the housing crisis.
Question from Aaron Violi
The member asked the Minister for Housing to state how many homeowners in the electorate of Hotham were currently in negative equity.
Background: The member cited a reported $1,000 drop in home values in Melbourne's Mount Waverley over 90 days.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The minister stated that government housing tax reforms would reverse a decade of decline in homeownership rates, enabling 750,000 households to access home ownership. She noted that house prices had risen by 400 per cent over the previous 25 years and argued that low-income young couples were now half as likely to own a home compared to when she was born. The minister asserted that the government's policies were designed to benefit young Australians and restore fairness to the housing market.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked the Minister for Housing why the number of first home buyers had decreased by more than six per cent this year.
Background: The member cited a reported drop of more than six per cent in the number of first home buyers during the current calendar year.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The minister stated that there had been more first home buyers each year under the current government than under any previous administration. She highlighted that the five per cent deposit program had assisted 260,000 Australians and that recent tax reforms would help 75,000 rental households purchase their first home. She argued that first home buyers were now on a level playing field at auctions, citing recent sales in Footscray and Wills as evidence of increased activity.
Question from Joanne Ryan
The member asked the Minister for Housing how the government was helping Australians achieve housing security and whether any risks existed to this work.
Background: The member asked about government efforts to help Australians into homes and potential risks.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The minister stated that almost 612,000 constituents had accessed their first home with government support. She highlighted a $2 billion investment in last-mile infrastructure to build 65,000 homes and landmark tax reforms. She identified the opposition's proposal to allow raiding superannuation for home purchases as a risk, citing economist Saul Eslake's criticism of the idea. She argued that such policies would push house prices higher and transfer wealth from young to older generations.
Question from David Batt
The member asked if the minister would admit that Labor's taxes had tanked the housing market.
Background: A shadow minister cited declines in home loan applications and attributed them to government taxes.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister defended the housing tax reforms, stating they level the playing field for first-home buyers. She claimed the reforms would reverse declining home ownership rates and help 75,000 households escape the rent trap. She highlighted the five per cent deposit scheme, which has helped 260,000 Australians into homes.
Question from Madonna Jarrett
The member asked what the government was doing to help Australians into safe homes and if there were risks to this work.
Background: A government member asked about the government's efforts to provide safe and affordable homes and any associated risks.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister outlined the $47 billion housing agenda, including the five per cent deposit scheme and tax reforms. She criticised the opposition for suggesting low-income Australians should accept substandard housing, citing comments from the shadow housing minister. She emphasised the government's commitment to safe, decent homes for all Australians.
Question from Trish Cook
The member asked how the government was providing safe housing for victims of domestic violence and what risks existed to these policies.
Background: A government member asked about housing for women and children escaping domestic violence.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister announced a $308 million investment for 448 new crisis and transitional homes, providing safe housing for 22,000 women and children. She noted this was part of a $1.2 billion investment in crisis housing and 7,200 social and affordable homes. She contrasted this with the previous government, which built only nine crisis homes over nine years, arguing that opposition rhetoric lacked action.
Question from Jess Teesdale
The member asked how the government is helping Australians achieve homeownership and what risks exist.
Background: The government's Homes for Australia plan aims to increase homeownership.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The minister cited the success of the five per cent deposit scheme, which has helped 260,000 Australians buy homes, and the Help to Buy program assisting 10,000 people annually. She shared an anecdote about a family in Tasmania who purchased a home through the scheme. She criticized the opposition for opposing these measures and defending investor subsidies.
Question from Angus Taylor
The member asked how many first home buyers had entered negative equity since the budget was delivered, citing the Minister's earlier concerns about this specific risk.
Background: The member referenced a previous statement by the Minister regarding the risk of first home buyers falling into negative equity due to low interest rates and large mortgages.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister stated that legislation passed the previous week delivered tax cuts for 13 million workers and created a level playing field for first home buyers, aiming to help 75,000 renters purchase homes. She noted that Treasury modelling predicted house prices would continue to grow but at a slower rate, approximately two percentage points less than otherwise, a figure supported by the Commonwealth Bank and the Grattan Institute. The Minister emphasized government support for first home buyers through the five per cent deposit program, Help to Buy, and the new tax reforms.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked whether the Minister had received or reviewed advice from Treasury or APRA regarding the number of first home buyers who would be pushed into negative equity due to the government's housing policy changes.
Background: The member claimed that Labor's housing policies could cause home values to collapse by 10 to 20 per cent, pushing first home buyers into negative equity.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister directed the member to the budget documents, specifically page 5 of the factsheet on capital gains tax and negative gearing. She quoted Treasury modelling indicating that reforms would increase the owner-occupier share of the market by around 75,000 over the next decade, reversing ten years of decline in home ownership rates. The Minister stated that the reduction in investor demand was expected to cause a small, temporary slowing in house price growth, estimated at around two per cent less over a couple of years compared to no policy change.
Question from Meryl Swanson
The member asked for details on how the government was assisting first home buyers and why its policies were better than alternative approaches.
Background: The member asked how the government was bringing about genuine change for first home buyers and why this method was better than alternatives.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister highlighted that over 2,000 people in the member's electorate had accessed their first home with government assistance. She described the Help to Buy shared equity scheme, the five per cent deposit program, and new legislation to ensure a level playing field at auctions. The Minister stated that these measures would help 75,000 households move from renting to owning. She contrasted this with the opposition's vote against these measures, claiming they opposed expanding the deposit program and scrapping Help to Buy, thereby disadvantaging first home buyers.
Question from Angie Bell
The member asked whether the government's housing tax policies were working as designed, given reports of plummeting auction clearance rates and collapsing demand.
Background: The Shadow Minister for Youth questioned the Minister for Housing about the impact of recent housing tax changes on auction clearance rates and demand.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The minister defended the legislation, stating it delivered tax cuts for 13 million workers and levelled the playing field for first home buyers. She cited Treasury advice that house prices would continue to rise but at a rate approximately two percentage points slower than otherwise. She highlighted that the changes would enable 75,000 Australians to transition from renting to homeownership. She criticised the opposition for ignoring the housing crisis during their nine years in government.
Question from Zoe McKenzie
The member asked how many first home buyers now owed more than their home was worth, citing previous comments about potential price collapses.
Background: The Shadow Assistant Minister for Employment questioned the Minister for Housing about the potential collapse of home values and negative equity for first home buyers.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The minister stated that the premise of the question was factually and utterly incorrect.
Question from Dan Tehan
The member asked how many first home buyers now owed more than their home was worth, referencing the minister's previous comments on house price corrections.
Background: The Shadow Minister for Energy questioned the Minister for Housing about negative equity for first home buyers, citing previous comments about market corrections.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The minister reiterated that the recent legislation delivered tax cuts and levelled the playing field for first home buyers. She cited Treasury modelling showing house prices would rise but at a rate two percentage points slower than otherwise. She stated that the changes would help 75,000 rental households become first home owners. She criticised the opposition for not supporting these changes to address the broken housing market.
Question from Anne Webster
The member asked how many first home buyers now owed more than their home was worth.
Background: The Shadow Minister for Regional Development asked the Minister for Housing about negative equity for first home buyers, repeating a previous question.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The minister stated she was not changing her answer to this repeated question. She defended the recent legislation as supporting first home buyers and part of a broader housing agenda. She highlighted that homeownership rates were falling, with low-income young couples half as likely to own homes compared to previous decades. She criticised the opposition for defending a broken status quo and failing to support first home buyers.
Question from Jess Teesdale
The member asked what measures the government was taking to help first-home buyers and which policies might make homeownership more difficult for young people.
Background: A government member asked the Minister for Housing about actions to assist first-home buyers and what approaches might hinder homeownership for young Australians.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister highlighted legislation aimed at leveling the playing field for first-home buyers and delivering tax cuts for all workers. She argued that the previous housing market structure favored investors, leading to a 400 per cent rise in house prices and declining homeownership rates for young people. She framed the current legislative choice as one between rewarding hard work or maintaining a system dependent on inherited wealth, asserting that the government's approach supported aspiration and fairness.
Question from Tim Wilson
The member asked how many Australians would suffer financial loss from a predicted 20 per cent drop in house values resulting from the government's tax changes.
Background: The member for Goldstein asked the Minister for Housing how many Australians would become poorer due to alleged house price collapses caused by the government's budget.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister rejected the premise of the question as a misrepresentation of her previous statements. She reiterated that the housing market had favored investors for 25 years, causing a 400 per cent price increase and falling homeownership rates for young people. She argued that the government aimed to create a fairer market for first-home buyers and noted inconsistencies in the opposition's position, citing their shadow spokesperson's desire for price declines.
Question from Mary Aldred
The member asked if the government would delay voting on property tax changes due to concerns about their impact on vulnerable groups such as widows and divorcees.
Background: The member for Monash asked the Minister for Housing if the government was backing down on tax changes that would disproportionately impact widows, divorcees, and domestic violence victims.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister stated that the government was aware of the issues and working through them. She confirmed that arrangements for jointly owned assets in cases of inheritance and divorce would be addressed in subsequent legislation. She also noted that exemptions for income from genuine testamentary trusts would apply to the minimum tax on capital gains.
Question from Andrew Hastie
The member asked when the Minister first realized that capital gains tax changes would negatively impact widows, divorcees, and domestic violence victims.
Background: The Deputy Leader of the Opposition asked the Minister for Housing when she first became aware that tax changes imposed a 'death tax' on widows and divorcees.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister stated that the government had been aware of the issues for some time and that the Treasurer had discussed the deliberations. She confirmed that the matters would be addressed in the second tranche of legislation.
Question from Leon Rebello
The member asked whether the government was aware of the issues with tax changes for widows and divorcees before or after the budget was presented.
Background: The member for McPherson asked the Minister for Housing if the government was aware of the impacts of tax changes on widows and divorcees before or after the budget was handed down.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister stated that the government was aware of the issues and working through them in the usual way. She confirmed that the matters would be resolved in future legislation.
Question from David Smith
The member asked what actions the government was taking to help Australians buy homes and which policies would make homeownership more difficult.
Background: The member asked about government actions to assist homeownership and policies that hinder it.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister highlighted legislation before the parliament that would provide tax cuts and level the playing field for first home buyers. She stated that the opposition intended to vote against these measures. She noted that the opposition wanted to scrap the Help to Buy program, which assists 10,000 first home owners annually. She also mentioned their intention to reduce the five per cent deposit program, which has helped 260,000 Australians. She accused the opposition of wanting to subsidize investors over first home buyers.
Question from Aaron Violi
The member asked who was telling the truth about whether the housing sector was facing a market correction, given conflicting statements from the Minister for Housing and the Treasurer.
Background: Contradictory statements were made by the Minister for Housing and the Treasurer regarding a housing market correction.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister stated that house prices had risen by 400 per cent over the last 25 years and that this trend must not continue. She argued that the housing market was broken and that the previous government had failed to address the issue. She noted that the previous government built only 373 social and affordable homes in nine years, with none in regional and rural Australia. She asserted that the current government was using all available levers to address the housing crisis.
Question from Zoe McKenzie
The member asked the Minister to explain why it was fair for her to benefit from negative gearing before changing the rules to disadvantage others.
Background: The member questioned the Minister for Housing on her use of negative gearing before policy changes.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister stated that housing reforms were about the 28 million Australians outside parliament, not the 150 members. She accused the opposition of perpetuating a system that leaves young people behind. She noted that low-income young people were half as likely to own a home as they were when she was born. She asserted that the Labor Party would vote for tax cuts and a fairer housing market. She criticized the opposition for defending the status quo.
Question from David Moncrieff
The member asked how the government is helping more Australians achieve homeownership and how this approach is more beneficial than others.
Background: A government member asked the Minister for Housing how the government is helping Australians achieve homeownership.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister stated that nearly 270,000 Australians have entered homeownership through the five per cent deposit program, with over 115,000 first home buyers purchasing annually. She criticized the opposition for wanting to cut Help to Buy and roll back the five per cent deposit scheme. She noted that the opposition supports higher capital gains tax discounts for investors, which she argued disadvantages first home buyers. She highlighted that thousands of constituents in opposition electorates have benefited from government programs.
Question from Trish Cook
The member asked how the government was helping more Australians achieve homeownership and how its approach benefited more Australians compared to other approaches.
Background: The member asked about government efforts to help Australians achieve homeownership.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister noted that the average period required to accumulate a 20 per cent deposit in Sydney had risen to 17 years. She highlighted the Help to Buy scheme, which assists 10,000 families, and the five per cent deposit program, which has helped 260,000 Australians. She stated that budget measures would help another 75,000 Australians enter homeownership. The Minister cited examples of first home buyers winning at auctions with government support, arguing that the government was creating opportunities for young people.
Question from Ali France
The member asked how the government was progressing toward delivering 55,000 new social and affordable homes and why this approach was superior to alternatives.
Background: A government member asked the Minister for Housing about progress on social housing commitments.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister stated that the government had completed more than 7,000 homes and had 23,000 in planning or construction. She highlighted recent construction starts in various electorates, totaling over 300 homes in the last six weeks alone. She argued that this pace exceeded the Coalition's output over a decade. She criticized the Opposition for neglecting social and affordable housing during their nine years in government, noting they built no such homes in regional and rural Australia.
Question from Anne Webster
The member asked if detached granny flats counted toward housing targets and why builders of such flats were excluded from negative gearing, suggesting the government was making up rules.
Background: The Shadow Minister for Regional Development questioned the definition of new builds under housing legislation.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister directed the member to page 6 of the budget fact sheet, which defined new builds. She listed examples of eligible new builds, such as apartments bought off the plan and duplexes replacing single houses. She clarified that established properties extended or granny flats built adjacent to established properties were not eligible for negative gearing. She criticized the Opposition for avoiding engagement on housing reform and for trying to undermine the legislation passed that morning.
Question from Henry Pike
The member asked if the government had acted as a guarantor for 51,000 non-citizens to buy their first home.
Background: The Shadow Assistant Minister for Mental Health questioned the eligibility of non-citizens for the First Home Guarantee.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister stated that 250,000 people had accessed the First Home Guarantee. She clarified that temporary migrants were not eligible, and only Australian citizens and permanent residents could participate. She criticized the Opposition for blaming permanent residents for housing challenges and for making comments that could be interpreted as discriminatory against communities that had contributed to the country for decades.
Question from Shayne Neumann
The member asked how the government was helping Australians into homeownership, the results of the five per cent deposit scheme, and why this approach was superior to alternatives.
Background: The government had implemented a five per cent deposit scheme to assist home buyers.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister stated that over 250,000 Australians had bought homes through the scheme, avoiding $2.3 billion in lenders mortgage insurance. She noted that 60 per cent of participants had larger deposits, 70 per cent were ahead on repayments, and one in four had exited the scheme. She criticized opposition parties for dismissing the program while the government supported first home buyers.
Question from Josh Burns
The member asked why the government's housing reforms are important for first-home buyers and what risks exist to this work.
Background: The member sought to highlight the importance of recent housing reforms for first-home buyers.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister stated that housing reforms aim to create a fairer system for first-home buyers, workers, and taxpayers. She highlighted the five per cent deposit program to level the playing field with investors. She criticized the opposition for supporting the status quo and privilege, asserting that Labor supports aspiration and homeownership for ordinary Australians.
Question from Michelle Landry
The member asked whether building a new second dwelling on an existing title would classify the whole title as a new dwelling under the tax reforms.
Background: The member questioned the definition of a 'new build' in the tax legislation, specifically regarding new dwellings on existing titles.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister stated that a new dwelling is defined as one that genuinely adds to housing supply.
Question from Leon Rebello
The member asked whether the government's migration policies, which brought in 1.4 million migrants, made it harder for Australians to afford homes.
Background: The opposition cited an RBA memo linking migration policy to the housing market and claimed record migration levels made housing unaffordable.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister stated that migration has been reduced to almost half its post-COVID high. She argued that the primary issue is a lack of housing construction over 40 years, not migration. She highlighted the government's $47 billion housing policy aimed at building more homes. She criticized the opposition for failing to address the housing crisis during their nine years in government.
Question from Zaneta Mascarenhas
The member inquired about the government's efforts to tackle the housing crisis via the Homes for Australia plan and asked if the minister was aware of other potential strategies.
Background: A government member asked the Minister for Housing about the government's actions to address the housing crisis through the Homes for Australia plan and whether alternative approaches were considered.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister described the Homes for Australia plan as a long-term strategy to rebuild the housing system, including tax reforms to create fair conditions for first-home buyers and provide tax cuts for workers. She emphasized that home ownership is a key aspiration for most families and that the tax changes aimed to build financial security. The Minister argued that the opposition sought to roll back these changes, which would perpetuate a system where home ownership depended on inherited wealth rather than personal effort.
Question from Alice Jordan-Baird
The member asked how the government was assisting Australians to secure housing and what other approaches to housing policy were available.
Background: A government member asked the Minister for Housing how the government was helping Australians get into homes and what alternative approaches existed.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister stated that the government was leveling the playing field for first-home buyers and had helped a quarter of a million Australians get keys to their own homes. She announced an additional $2 billion investment in last-mile infrastructure to unlock 65,000 homes, building on previous commitments, and noted the delivery of 55,000 social and affordable homes. She criticized the opposition for doing nothing about the housing crisis during their nine years in government and for failing to build any social or affordable homes in regional Australia. She asserted that the government had the most ambitious housing plan in 70 years.
Question from Kate Thwaites
The member asked the Minister to describe the reception of the housing reforms by experts and advocates and to identify any alternative policy approaches.
Background: A government member asked the Minister for Housing how experts and advocates have received the housing reform package and if alternative approaches exist.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister stated that experts, economists, and housing advocates support the reforms, which aim to level the playing field for first-home buyers. She cited positive comments from economist Saul Eslake, National Shelter, and former Liberal minister Rob Stokes. She argued that the coalition defends the broken status quo, while the government's plan, including the five per cent deposit program, supports both first-home buyers and new housing supply.
Question from Mary Doyle
The member asked the Minister for Housing how the government's reforms were assisting first-home buyers and whether there were any risks to these initiatives.
Background: A government member asked about the effectiveness of housing reforms for first-home buyers.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister reported that first-home buyers were increasingly successful at auctions, citing examples from St Kilda East, Yarraville, and Ardeer. She stated that hundreds of thousands of young people would own homes by the next election due to government policies. She identified the opposition's desire to scrap the five per cent deposit program and Help to Buy scheme as the primary risk to these efforts. She argued that the opposition was defending a broken system that excluded young people from homeownership.
Question from Gabriel Ng
The member asked how the government is helping first-home buyers, why this is important, and if the minister was aware of alternative approaches.
Background: A government member asked the Minister for Housing how the government is assisting first-home buyers and the importance of these efforts.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister stated that the government has the most ambitious housing agenda in 70 years, aimed at leveling the playing field and building more homes. She cited the five per cent deposit scheme, which has helped 240,000 Australians, and budget reforms to redirect investment toward new supply, supporting another 75,000 households. She criticized the Opposition for opposing these supports and seeking to abolish the five per cent deposit program and recent reforms, arguing that the status quo is not working for Australians.
Question from Sarah Witty
The member asked how the government is building more homes and how the budget further supports housing supply, and how this compares to alternative approaches.
Background: A government member asked the Minister for Housing how the government is building homes and how the budget supports housing supply.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister stated that new housing commencements had risen 26 per cent in the last year. She highlighted $2 billion in the budget for enabling infrastructure, bringing total housing infrastructure investment to $6.3 billion. She claimed this was 50 times more than the previous government spent on housing infrastructure. She criticized the Opposition for not having a housing minister and for opposing previous housing measures.
Question from Matt Gregg
The member asked how the government was assisting first home buyers and whether the minister was aware of any risks to these efforts.
Background: A government member asked the Minister for Housing how the government was helping first home buyers and if there were any risks to this work.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister stated that homeownership rates were declining, particularly for younger Australians, with low-income young couples half as likely to own a home as in 1980. She highlighted the five per cent deposit program, which had reduced the time to save a deposit from 11 years to two or three, benefiting 240,000 Australians. The Minister noted that the homeownership package would help an additional 75,000 Australians transition from renting to homeownership. She identified the risk that the Liberal Party planned to oppose and unwind these reforms at the next election, contrasting this with the government's commitment to helping first home buyers.
Question from Madonna Jarrett
The member asked how the fuel crisis was impacting housing construction and how the government was responding.
Background: The fuel crisis was impacting various sectors.
Answer from Clare O'Neil
The Minister noted that construction was a major user of diesel and that fuel costs flowed directly to builders. She highlighted the importance of securing fuel supply through government actions like releasing reserves and adjusting standards. She mentioned support for small businesses in the construction sector through tax leniency. She noted that construction costs had risen from 17.3 per cent to 1.8 per cent since the government took office.
Other Parliamentary Activity
-
Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026, Income Tax Rates Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill 2026; Second Reading
House of Representatives · Wednesday 3 June 2026 · Second Reading
Responded as minister
-
Bondi Beach Attack Victims
House of Representatives · Monday 19 January 2026 · Condolence
Contributed to this debate
-
Housing
House of Representatives · Wednesday 27 August 2025 · Ministerial Statement
Opened this debate
- Votes recorded
- 233
- Aye votes (57.5%)
- 134
- No votes (42.5%)
- 99
Showing the latest 50 votes.
-
Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Amendment (Veterans' Healthcare With...
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 85, Noes 40 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Rearrangement
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 42, Noes 87 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Suspension of Standing and Sessional Orders
17 Sep 2026 · Ayes 42, Noes 89 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Suspension of Standing and Sessional Orders
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 85, Noes 44 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 88, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 87, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 9, Noes 85 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 86, Noes 47 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 45, Noes 87 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Private Health Insurance Amendment (Modernising the Private Health Insurance ...
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 46, Noes 86 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Rearrangement
16 Sep 2026 · Ayes 84, Noes 13 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Rearrangement
15 Sep 2026 · Ayes 49, Noes 87 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Consideration of Legislation
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 43, Noes 87 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; Consideration of Senate Message
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 95, Noes 43 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; Consideration of Senate Message
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 95, Noes 42 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Albanese Government; Attempted Censure
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 46, Noes 86 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Statute Update Bill 2026; Consideration of Senate Message
14 Sep 2026 · Ayes 84, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Veterans
7 Sep 2026 · Ayes 88, Noes 49 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Cash Distribution Framework Bill 2026; Consideration of Senate Message
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 84, Noes 34 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Economy
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 41, Noes 85 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Universities Accord (Opening the Doors of Opportunity) Bill 2026; Considerati...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 36 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment Bill 2026; Report from Federation Cha...
20 Aug 2026 · Ayes 39, Noes 90 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Australia's Foreign Relations (State and Territory Arrangements) Amendment Bi...
19 Aug 2026 · Ayes 38, Noes 80 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Combatting Illicit Tobacco Bill 2026; Report from Federation Chamber
19 Aug 2026 · Ayes 41, Noes 84 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Minister for Veterans' Affairs
19 Aug 2026 · Ayes 83, Noes 44 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
News Journalism Payments Bill 2026; Second Reading
19 Aug 2026 · Ayes 40, Noes 83 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026; Consideration in ...
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 33, Noes 95 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026; Second Reading
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 12, Noes 86 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Interactive Gambling Amendment (Gambling Reform) Bill 2026; Second Reading
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 12, Noes 85 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion
18 Aug 2026 · Ayes 87, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Minister for Veterans' Affairs and Defence Personnel; Attempted Censure
17 Aug 2026 · Ayes 86, Noes 43 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Cash Distribution Framework Bill 2026; Reference to Federation Chamber
12 Aug 2026 · Ayes 40, Noes 83 · Failed
VOTED NO -
International Relations: Australia and Japan
12 Aug 2026 · Ayes 88, Noes 41 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Aged Care Amendment (Restoring Human Override for Aged Care Needs Assessments...
11 Aug 2026 · Ayes 42, Noes 87 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Rearrangement
11 Aug 2026 · Ayes 86, Noes 47 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Rearrangement
2 Jul 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 42 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Minister for Defence Industry; Attempted Censure
2 Jul 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 41 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Health Insurance Amendment (Incentive Payments and Other Measures) Bill 2026;...
2 Jul 2026 · Ayes 39, Noes 92 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Social Policy and Legal Affairs Committee; Reference
2 Jul 2026 · Ayes 13, Noes 78 · Failed
VOTED NO -
Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Joint Committee; Appointment
2 Jul 2026 · Ayes 38, Noes 101 · Failed
VOTED NO -
National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Securing the NDIS for Future ...
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 33 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Health Legislation Amendment (Prescribing of Pharmaceutical Benefits) Bill 20...
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 43 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Health Legislation Amendment (Prescribing of Pharmaceutical Benefits) Bill 20...
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 90, Noes 43 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minim...
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 43, Noes 92 · Failed
VOTED NO -
National Anti-Corruption Commission Joint Committee; Consideration of Senate ...
1 Jul 2026 · Ayes 93, Noes 45 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Member for Groom
30 Jun 2026 · Ayes 102, Noes 33 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Reporting System Reform) Bill 2026; Consid...
30 Jun 2026 · Ayes 98, Noes 40 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Treasury Laws Amendment (Financial Reporting System Reform) Bill 2026; Consid...
30 Jun 2026 · Ayes 91, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Albanese Government
30 Jun 2026 · Ayes 91, Noes 48 · Passed
VOTED AYE -
Workplace Relations Legislation Amendment (Building Cooperative Workplaces No...
30 Jun 2026 · Ayes 97, Noes 42 · Passed
VOTED AYE
About this page
This page tracks Clare O'Neil's parliamentary activity: questions asked and answered in Question Time, debates spoken in, and votes in divisions. Summaries are in reported speech, not transcripts; each one links to the official record.