Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Criminal Code Amendment (State Sponsors of Terrorism) Bill 2025; Second Reading

Senate · Wednesday 5 November 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Senator Claire Chandler spoke in support of the bill, which creates a framework to designate foreign state entities as sponsors of terrorism. She argued the legislation was necessary to list the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist organisation but criticised the government for delaying action despite earlier recommendations and evidence. Chandler highlighted specific attacks in Sydney and Melbourne as examples of the threat posed by the regime. She called for the release of previously drafted listing documents to demonstrate transparency.

Outcome

The debate was interrupted.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Claire Chandler (TAS) (Liberal Party) Liberal

Chandler supported the bill as a critical measure to close gaps in national security by allowing the designation of foreign state entities as terrorism sponsors. Chandler argued the legislation was long overdue, noting that the coalition had called for the listing of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps for nearly three years. Chandler stated that the government had possessed the necessary evidence and drafted documents since early 2023 but chose to delay action. Chandler emphasised that the Iranian Australian community had raised concerns about harassment and foreign interference well before recent attacks occurred.