Question Time AU

Bill Debate · In Committee

Criminal Code Amendment (State Sponsors of Terrorism) Bill 2025; In Committee

Senate · Thursday 6 November 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The Senate debated Australian Greens amendments seeking to create specific exemptions for designated humanitarian entities under the Criminal Code. The government and the coalition opposed the amendments, arguing that the bill was not the appropriate vehicle for such changes and that broader reforms required careful consideration and state agreement. The amendments were defeated by a vote of 12 to 34.

Outcome

The amendments were not passed, with a division result of 12 votes in favour and 34 against.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Faruqi moved amendments to insert a definition for designated humanitarian entities and create exceptions for humanitarian aid in terrorist organisation offences. Faruqi argued that current laws create legal risks that hinder aid delivery in regions controlled by proscribed actors. Faruqi stated that the amendments align with international standards and a bipartisan recommendation from the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade. Faruqi urged the government to support the changes to protect aid workers.

Government response

Green stated that the government would not support the amendments at this time. Green explained that the bill addresses state-sponsored terrorism and is not suitable for broader changes to the counter-terrorism framework. Green noted that changes to Part 5.3 of the Criminal Code require agreement from first ministers due to referral powers. Green confirmed that the government is actively engaging with humanitarian organisations on these complex matters.

Opposition response

Chandler indicated that the coalition would not support the amendments. Chandler expressed sympathy for the concerns of non-government organisations regarding protection under counter-terrorism provisions. Chandler cited advice from the Attorney-General's Department that the bill was not the appropriate place for such changes. Chandler emphasised the importance of passing the bill without unintended consequences.

Votes during this debate

Division 2: Criminal Code Amendment (State Sponsors of Terrorism) Bill 2025; In Committee Not passed 12–34