Without Notice

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Sport Legislation Amendment (World Anti-Doping Code Implementation) Bill 2026; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Tuesday 13 October 2026

Continued from Thursday 17 September 2026.

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate concerned the Sport Legislation Amendment (World Anti-Doping Code Implementation) Bill 2026, which aimed to align Australian law with the revised World Anti-Doping Code effective 1 January 2027. Speakers supported the legislation's principles, including strengthened athlete appeal rights, operational independence for Sport Integrity Australia, and enhanced privacy protections, while citing the need for fair competition ahead of major international events. However, the opposition criticized the government for delaying the bill's introduction and for broader failures in sports funding and integrity. The discussion concluded with the adjournment of the Federation Chamber.

Outcome

The debate was adjourned.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Continued the debate

Bell supported the bill as necessary to maintain Australia's status as a leader in sport integrity and to comply with international obligations. Bell highlighted that the legislation strengthens athlete appeal rights regarding therapeutic use exemptions and transfers sanctioning powers to Sport Integrity Australia to ensure independence. Bell also noted improved privacy safeguards for minors and recreational athletes. However, she strongly criticised the government for introducing the bill late, arguing this placed undue pressure on public servants. Bell further alleged that the Minister for Sport had failed to support the Rockhampton rowing venue for the 2032 Olympics and had created uncertainty through funding cuts to grassroots sports programs.

Get updates like this by email