Question Time AU

Matter of Public Importance

Prime Minister

House of Representatives · Wednesday 1 April 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on the government's management of fuel shortages and price increases caused by international conflict. The opposition criticised the Prime Minister for mixed messaging, lack of transparency regarding fuel stocks, and delayed action, arguing that the government had adopted opposition policies only after initial refusal. Government members defended their record, citing the halving of the fuel excise, the release of strategic reserves, and coordinated efforts with states and industry to secure supply. They accused the opposition of stoking panic and failing to offer a constructive alternative plan.

Outcome

The motion was debated as a Matter of Public Importance; no vote was taken.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Taylor argued that the government lacked leadership, transparency, and accountability in managing the fuel crisis. Taylor cited contradictory statements from ministers regarding the severity of the situation and the availability of fuel. Taylor demanded daily public reporting on fuel stock levels, the number of empty service stations, and shipping delays. Taylor claimed the government had ignored the opposition's proposal to cut the fuel excise until forced to act, and he highlighted the economic strain on households from inflation and interest rates.

Government response

Thistlethwaite defended the government's coordinated response, including the halving of the fuel excise and the release of 20 per cent of strategic fuel reserves held onshore. Thistlethwaite argued that the opposition's previous policy of storing reserves offshore would have left Australia vulnerable. Thistlethwaite cited support for the government's plan from business groups, farmers, and some crossbench members. Thistlethwaite accused the opposition of lacking a credible plan and of undermining public trust through alarmist rhetoric.