Without Notice

General Debate

Climate Change

House of Representatives · Monday 12 October 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on a motion moved by Zali Steggall calling for legislated climate risk assessments, dedicated adaptation funding, and the release of intelligence reports on climate security. Sarah Witty highlighted the government's existing emissions targets, renewable energy investments, and the National Adaptation Plan. Monique Ryan supported the motion, emphasising the need for proactive resilience measures over reactive recovery spending and criticising the government's handling of fossil fuel exports and security transparency.

Outcome

The motion was debated as part of private members' business.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Steggall argued that climate change poses escalating economic and security risks, citing billions in insured losses and rising premiums. Steggall called for legally mandated five-yearly climate risk assessments and an allocation of 0.25 per cent of GDP to adaptation. Steggall urged the government to establish a National Climate Adaptation Authority, update building codes for resilience, and release a declassified intelligence report on climate security threats. Steggall also highlighted the impact on Pacific neighbours and criticised the approval of new fossil fuel projects.

Get updates like this by email