Repeal Net Zero Bill 2025

Stage by Stage

Summaries in reported speech - not a transcript. In date order, both chambers.

1. Monday 28 July 2025 · House of Representatives

   Second Reading

   The debate concerned the Repeal Net Zero Bill 2025, which sought to reverse net zero emissions targets. Barnaby Joyce moved the motion, arguing that net zero policies were ineffective for climate change, harmful to the economy, and disproportionately affecting low-income Australians and rural communities. Colin Boyce seconded the motion, highlighting the threat to Queensland's resource industries and the reliability of renewable energy. Both speakers opposed the government's climate agenda, citing rising energy costs and industrial decline. No government minister or shadow minister responded during this segment of the debate.

   Read the full summary

2. Monday 25 August 2025 · House of Representatives

   Second Reading

   The debate centred on whether to repeal Australia's net zero emissions target. National Party and Liberal National Party members argued the policy was economically damaging, citing failed renewable projects and high energy costs, while Labor members defended the transition as essential for economic resilience and climate safety. The opposition claimed the government was forcing unready technologies, whereas Labor highlighted record renewable investment and household savings. The bill was opposed by the government and supported by the crossbench and opposition.

   Outcome: The transcript does not state the final vote result.

   Read the full summary

3. Monday 1 September 2025 · House of Representatives

   Second Reading

   The debate centred on whether to repeal Australia's net zero emissions target by 2050. Coalition members argued that the current policy imposes excessive economic costs, threatens jobs in traditional industries, and relies on unreliable renewable energy sources requiring taxpayer subsidies. Labor members contended that the bill represented climate denialism, ignored the economic opportunities in clean energy, and betrayed the electorate's desire for climate action. The bill was supported by the Coalition and opposed by Labor.

   Outcome: The transcript does not state the final result of the vote.

   Read the full summary

4. Thursday 4 September 2025 · Senate

   First Reading
   See who spoke

5. Thursday 4 September 2025 · Senate

   Second Reading

   Senator Matthew Canavan moved the second reading of the Repeal Net Zero Bill 2025, arguing that Australia's net zero commitments have harmed the economy and industries. He claimed that high energy prices resulting from the transition to renewables have caused inflation and led to the loss of manufacturing sectors such as urea, plastics, and nickel. Canavan asserted that global emissions continue to rise while major emitters increase coal production, rendering Australia's efforts ineffective. The debate was adjourned after Canavan sought leave to continue his remarks later.

   Outcome: Debate adjourned after leave was granted for the senator to continue remarks later.

   Read the full summary

6. Monday 27 October 2025 · House of Representatives

   Second Reading

   The debate centred on whether to repeal Australia's commitment to achieving net zero emissions by 2050. The Liberal member for Barker supported the bill, arguing that net zero policies were economically damaging and ignored global emission trends from other nations. Labor members and an Independent senator opposed the legislation, citing the immediate impacts of climate change, the economic benefits of renewable energy investment, and the political necessity of maintaining policy certainty. The debate highlighted a sharp divide between those viewing net zero as an economic burden and those seeing it as a strategic opportunity.

   Read the full summary

7. Monday 3 November 2025 · House of Representatives

   Second Reading

   The debate centred on whether to repeal Australia's net zero emissions targets and associated legislation. The Liberal Party member argued that current policies were destroying mining and agricultural industries in Western Australia through high costs and land use conflicts. Labor members countered that net zero relies on offsets and market-driven technology, not industry shutdowns, and highlighted significant investment in renewable energy. The bill was opposed by Labor representatives who argued it ignored economic opportunities in clean energy.

   Outcome: The transcript does not state the final result of the vote.

   Read the full summary

8. Monday 24 November 2025 · House of Representatives

   Second Reading

   The debate centred on the Repeal Net Zero Bill 2025, which sought to dismantle Australia's net zero emissions framework. Coalition members argued that the government's agenda imposed excessive costs on taxpayers and businesses through subsidies and taxes, while failing to lower energy prices. Labor and Independent members opposed the bill, asserting that repealing net zero targets would increase electricity costs, create economic uncertainty, and abandon a necessary transition to renewable energy. The discussion highlighted divergent views on the reliability of renewable energy versus fossil fuels and the economic impact of policy changes.

   Read the full summary