Repeal Net Zero Bill 2025; Second Reading

Repacholi opposed the bill, clarifying that net zero involves balancing emissions with offsets rather than shutting down industries. Repacholi noted that the Minerals Council of Australia had voluntarily set net zero targets, indicating that mining companies did not view the goal as destructive to their business. Repacholi argued that while coal remains important, the market has moved towards cheaper and more efficient renewable options, such as rooftop solar and batteries. Repacholi highlighted that Hunter households were rapidly adopting battery technology to reduce costs, demonstrating that the transition supports economic stability.

French opposed the bill, characterising it as a retreat from practical economic progress and a rejection of regional opportunities. French argued that net zero was driving industry growth, citing a 30 per cent rise in renewable generation and $12.7 billion in investment since Labor took office. French stated that over four million homes now produced their own power, benefiting consumers through lower costs and new jobs in regional areas. French criticised the National Party for abandoning net zero, arguing that this stance ignored the economic benefits of clean energy for farmers and workers.