Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Repeal Net Zero Bill 2025; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Monday 28 July 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate concerned the Repeal Net Zero Bill 2025, which sought to reverse net zero emissions targets. Barnaby Joyce moved the motion, arguing that net zero policies were ineffective for climate change, harmful to the economy, and disproportionately affecting low-income Australians and rural communities. Colin Boyce seconded the motion, highlighting the threat to Queensland's resource industries and the reliability of renewable energy. Both speakers opposed the government's climate agenda, citing rising energy costs and industrial decline. No government minister or shadow minister responded during this segment of the debate.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Barnaby Joyce (New England) (National Party) One Nation

Joyce argued that net zero policies had no meaningful impact on global climate change because major economies were not participating. Joyce claimed these policies reduced GDP per capita, increased energy costs for businesses and households, and drove manufacturing industries out of Australia. Joyce stated that the transition was dividing communities and weakening national defence capabilities. Joyce criticised the lack of government underwriting for renewable energy decommissioning costs, citing potential liabilities for farmers. Joyce concluded that the policies primarily benefited billionaires while harming ordinary Australians and rural landholders.