Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Repeal Net Zero Bill 2025; Second Reading

Senate · Thursday 4 September 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Senator Matthew Canavan moved the second reading of the Repeal Net Zero Bill 2025, arguing that Australia's net zero commitments have harmed the economy and industries. He claimed that high energy prices resulting from the transition to renewables have caused inflation and led to the loss of manufacturing sectors such as urea, plastics, and nickel. Canavan asserted that global emissions continue to rise while major emitters increase coal production, rendering Australia's efforts ineffective. The debate was adjourned after Canavan sought leave to continue his remarks later.

Outcome

Debate adjourned after leave was granted for the senator to continue remarks later.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Matthew Canavan (QLD) (Liberal National Party) LNP

Canavan argued that the net zero commitment made at the Glasgow conference in December 2021 was based on the false premise that major emitters were decarbonising. Canavan claimed that since adopting net zero, electricity and gas prices rose by 40 per cent due to the closure of coal power stations and replacement with costlier renewables. Canavan cited a Page Research Centre report stating new coal-fired power is 35 per cent cheaper than renewable options backed by gas. Canavan asserted that high energy costs have caused the loss of the urea, plastics, and nickel industries, forcing Australia to import fertiliser and threatening over 8000 jobs in smelters and refineries.