Repeal Net Zero Bill 2025; Second Reading

Phillips argued that climate change was already causing severe damage to her electorate through bushfires, floods, and landslips, necessitating immediate action. Phillips highlighted the success of the Cheaper Home Batteries Program, noting over 90,000 installations since its launch on 1 July. Phillips stated that the government was providing energy bill relief and implementing new market rules to protect consumers from unfair pricing. Phillips maintained that the transition to renewables was essential for reducing costs and addressing the conclusive science behind climate change.

Chaney described the bill as a rejection of economic opportunities and environmental responsibility, warning that repealing the target would undermine policy certainty for investors. Chaney argued that Australia possessed the resources and expertise to lead in renewable energy, critical minerals, and clean manufacturing. Chaney noted that the National Farmers' Federation supported net zero targets, contrasting this with the Coalition's stance. Chaney urged the Coalition to abandon climate wars and reaffirm its commitment to net zero to regain political credibility and support economic growth.

Cook criticised the Coalition for aligning with One Nation and seeking to undo previous climate commitments, calling the bill a political stunt. Cook cited high uptake of the Cheaper Home Batteries Program in her electorate, with 645 installations, as evidence of community support for sensible climate action. Cook listed government achievements, including cutting emissions by 29 per cent below 2005 levels and adding 18 gigawatts of renewable energy. Cook argued that the bill threatened economic stability and ignored the practical benefits of clean energy for households.