Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026; In Committee

Opened the debate

Hume questioned the proportion of the bill dedicated to reducing red tape for businesses versus public sector paperwork. Hume sought clarification on the bill's contribution to the projected $10.2 billion annual reduction in regulatory burden. Hume raised concerns about the removal of mandatory notification requirements for individuals named in adverse allegations by the Human Rights Commission, arguing this compromised procedural fairness. Hume also questioned the urgency and consultation process regarding the Compensation Scheme of Last Resort special levy.

Government response

Gallagher stated that the bill included measures to simplify business regulation and improve customer experience through a 'tell us once' approach. Gallagher explained that the Human Rights Commission advised that mandatory notifications caused administrative delays and distress to non-respondents, justifying the shift to discretionary notification. Gallagher defended the CSLR amendment as necessary to expedite compensation payments to consumers, noting that the shorter disallowance period preserved parliamentary oversight. Gallagher confirmed that the government would not proceed with an earlier amendment regarding electoral transparency.