Question Time AU

Bill Debate · In Committee

National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Integrity and Safeguarding) Bill 2025; In Committee

Senate · Tuesday 31 March 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The Senate considered amendments to the National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Integrity and Safeguarding) Bill 2025 during committee stage. The Coalition moved an amendment to clarify that correspondence nominees cannot withdraw participants from the scheme, which the Government supported to close an unintended loophole. The Greens moved several amendments, including one to oppose Schedule 2 Part 3 and another to protect whistleblower privacy, with mixed results. The Greens also proposed whistleblower protection amendments, which were defeated. The debate concluded with the passage of some amendments and the rejection of others.

Outcome

The Coalition amendment was agreed to, the Greens amendment on sheet 3687 was not passed, the Greens privacy amendment on sheet 3751 was agreed to, and the Greens whistleblower amendments on sheet 3758 were not passed.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Ruston moved an amendment to prevent correspondence nominees from withdrawing participants from the National Disability Insurance Scheme or cancelling such withdrawals against the participant's wishes. Ruston argued that the current bill contained an unintended loophole that risked removing agency from participants by allowing nominees to make decisions contrary to their interests. Ruston stated that the amendment would ensure decisions remained with the participant and noted that the Government had indicated support for this practical change.

Government response

McAllister confirmed that the Government supported the Coalition's amendment, thanking the Opposition for collaborating on the draft. McAllister explained that the committee had identified that the original provisions could inadvertently allow correspondence nominees to withdraw participants, which exceeded their intended role. McAllister stated that the Government agreed that plan nominees were better placed to exercise this function and that the amendment clarified the bill's intent.

Votes during this debate

Division 2: National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Integrity and Safeguarding) Bill 2025; In Committee Passed 30–11 Division 3: National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Integrity and Safeguarding) Bill 2025; In Committee Not passed 12–32 Division 4: National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Integrity and Safeguarding) Bill 2025; In Committee Not passed 13–30