Answers to Questions

O'Neill criticised the opposition for using alarmist rhetoric to create unnecessary anxiety in the community. O'Neill asserted that the government's answers were clear and accurate, and that security agencies were performing their duties confidentially and effectively. O'Neill stated that the government was not providing assistance or repatriating individuals from Syrian camps, and that reports suggesting otherwise were incorrect. O'Neill emphasised the importance of having confidence in the National Intelligence Community and other security agencies, noting their role in protecting national sovereignty and safety.

Polley argued that the opposition was repeating strategies from the previous term that had been rejected by voters, specifically by peddling unsubstantiated claims to cause anxiety. Polley expressed confidence in the intelligence and security agencies, including the Australian Federal Police, which she oversees through a committee. Polley stated that ministers provided answers to the best of their knowledge and that the government prioritised the safety of Australian citizens. Polley criticised the opposition for taking political cheap shots and failing to instil confidence in the agencies responsible for national security.

Canavan argued that the government lacked transparency and was not being honest with the Australian people. Canavan cited the acting New South Wales Police Chief's statement that state police were working with Commonwealth authorities on the potential relocation of ISIS associates, contrasting this with the federal government's silence. Canavan expressed concern about the security risks of assessing individuals only after they have arrived in Australia, rather than conducting interviews and risk assessments overseas. Canavan called for the government to be upfront about its management of this cohort and to ensure that national security remained the paramount consideration.