Cybersafety

Opened the debate

Payman argued that the government’s focus on restricting social media for teenagers while leaving younger children exposed to hardcore pornography was inconsistent and inadequate. Payman highlighted research indicating that pornography negatively impacts brain chemistry, reinforces violence against women, and distorts young people’s understanding of relationships and consent. Payman criticised the slow progress of the age assurance trial and called for immediate, bipartisan action to protect children from harmful content. Payman urged senators to set aside political differences and prioritise the safety and wellbeing of young Australians.

Government response

Green stated that the government was committed to minimising harm from inappropriate online content through a multifaceted approach. Green detailed the $6.5 million funding for an age assurance technology trial and the eSafety Commissioner’s development of mandatory industry codes to restrict access to adult material. Green also highlighted the recent legislation criminalising the sharing of non-consensual deepfake sexual material. Green emphasised the importance of supporting parents with evidence-based resources and guidance to help children navigate online risks safely.

Opposition response

Liddle identified online pornography and child exploitation as a priority for the Coalition, noting the rapid path from innocent content to illicit material. Liddle referenced the Coalition’s commitment to implementing a social media age limit of 16 within 100 days of an election victory and doubling the size of the Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation. Liddle cited statistics on the rise in self-harm hospitalisations among young girls and the increase in child exploitation reports. Liddle argued for stronger measures to protect children and equip parents with necessary tools and awareness.