Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Thursday 25 June 2026

Continued from Wednesday 24 June 2026.

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate focused on two main reforms: mandating the publication of specialist fees on the Medical Costs Finder website to improve price transparency, and closing a loophole allowing insurers to 'phoenix' products by replacing them with higher-priced equivalents without ministerial approval. All speakers supported the bill, arguing that cost uncertainty causes patients to delay care and that the previous voluntary disclosure system had failed due to low uptake. The legislation aims to empower consumers with data on out-of-pocket costs and strengthen oversight of private health insurance premiums.

Outcome

The bill was not passed, with divisions resulting in 10 votes against and 71 votes for.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Continued the debate

Repacholi argued that the bill addresses significant cost uncertainty that causes over 800,000 Australians to delay or miss specialist care. Repacholi highlighted that the previous voluntary fee disclosure system on the Medical Costs Finder website had failed, with only a handful of specialists participating. The bill mandates the publication of fee data using existing government records, allowing patients to compare costs and understand insurer coverage. Repacholi also supported measures to outlaw product phoenixing, where insurers replace products with similar but more expensive ones, thereby restoring consumer confidence and accountability in the private health insurance sector.

Government response

Butler confirmed that Schedule 1 mandates the publication of specialist fees to enable informed consumer choice, noting that the voluntary approach had resulted in fewer than 100 specialists uploading data out of thousands. Butler stated that Schedule 2 strengthens ministerial oversight by requiring approval for new products and reductions in cover, effectively stopping product phoenixing. Butler acknowledged amendments circulated by the member for Kooyong but indicated the government would not accept them, while committing to work with stakeholders on the implementation of the Medical Costs Finder changes.

Votes during this debate

Division 1: Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026; Second Reading Not passed 10–71 Division 2: Health Legislation Amendment (Improving Choice and Transparency for Private Health Consumers) Bill 2026; Second Reading Not passed 10–71