Without Notice

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Private Health Insurance (National Joint Replacement Register Levy) Amendment Bill 2026; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Tuesday 13 October 2026

Continued from Thursday 17 September 2026.

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate concerned a bill to remove the $5,000 annual cap on levies paid by medical device companies to fund the National Joint Replacement Registry, aiming to distribute costs proportionally based on device volume. The Coalition supported the technical change but opposed the government's cuts to private health insurance rebates for seniors, arguing this would increase public hospital waiting lists. Independent members moved amendments calling for a coordinated national health data strategy and integration with the Australian Centre for Disease Control. The government defended the bill as a fairer funding mechanism and rejected the amendments, focusing on the specific purpose of the legislation.

Outcome

The amendments moved by Melissa McIntosh and Monique Ryan were not supported by the government, and the bill proceeded without them.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Continued the debate

McIntosh stated the Coalition would not oppose the bill, describing it as a sensible technical change supported by industry bodies. However, McIntosh criticised the government for cutting private health insurance rebates for Australians over 65, arguing this would force many pensioners to downgrade cover and join public waiting lists for joint replacements. McIntosh highlighted that joint replacements are critical for independence and that public elective surgery waiting lists are already excessive. McIntosh moved an amendment noting the impact of rebate cuts on older Australians and criticising the government for the policy.

Government response

White thanked members for their contributions, particularly regarding health data interoperability. White stated the government would not support the amendments moved by McIntosh or Ryan, as the bill serves a specific purpose of ensuring fair and sustainable funding for the registry. White emphasised that removing the cap ensures levies are allocated proportionally to the volume of devices supplied by companies. White indicated willingness to discuss the broader data issues raised in the amendments with the minister.

Get updates like this by email