Question Time AU

General Debate

Fuel Security

House of Representatives · Monday 30 March 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on a motion moved by the opposition regarding Australia's fuel security, which argued that the nation was dangerously exposed due to low reserves and reliance on imports. Opposition members criticised the government for delayed responses, mixed messaging, and prioritising climate goals over energy resilience, calling for tax cuts and increased domestic production. Government members defended their actions, citing the release of strategic reserves, amendments to fuel standards, and underwriting of imports, while attributing the crisis to global geopolitical events and the opposition's past closure of refineries. The discussion highlighted tensions between immediate supply management and long-term energy policy directions.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Hamilton moved a motion noting that Australia held among the lowest sovereign fuel reserves in the OECD and imported over 90 per cent of its refined fuel. Hamilton argued that the government had failed to deliver a comprehensive fuel security strategy or contingency plans for diesel supply disruptions. Hamilton claimed the Minister for Climate Change and Energy had prioritised net-zero transitions over short-term resilience and had been absent during the crisis. Hamilton called for urgent development of a national fuel security plan, increased onshore storage, and targeted support for transport operators.