Continued the debate
O'Sullivan argued that the bill provides a constructive framework for managing international student migration by transitioning from an uncapped to a capped system, allowing the minister to align commencements with economic and infrastructure needs. O'Sullivan supported the intent of regional funding but identified two major loopholes: the broad definition of high-priority areas and the allowance for metro-delivered courses to receive regional funds. O'Sullivan stated that the Coalition would move amendments to close these loopholes and guarantee that regional funding strictly applies to regional areas. O'Sullivan also criticised the bill for reducing student choice by restricting overenrolment, which he argued allows universities to respond to demand and educate more students efficiently. The Coalition intended to support the bill only if these amendments were accepted.