Migration Amendment (2026 Measures No. 1) Bill 2026; First Reading

Shoebridge opposed the motion to proceed without formalities, arguing the bill grants excessive discretion to the Minister without parliamentary oversight. Shoebridge claimed the legislation was rushed through the House of Representatives and introduced in the Senate without public consultation or adequate inquiry. Shoebridge asserted the bill effectively shuts the door on 7,200 Iranians with valid visas, preventing them from entering Australia to make onshore asylum claims. Shoebridge contrasted the government's approach with historical humanitarian responses, such as the intake of Chinese students in 1989, and criticised the lack of scrutiny.

Smith put the question that the bill proceed without formalities and subsequently put the question for the first reading. Smith facilitated the procedural steps required to advance the bill through the Senate stages.