Opened the debate
Chisholm argued that the bill was necessary to ensure the scheme remained sustainable, safe, and operated with integrity. Chisholm stated that previous reforms had addressed rapid spending growth, but further action was required to combat fraud and protect participants from abuse. The member highlighted that the vast majority of providers acted correctly, but some exploited the system, necessitating stronger regulatory powers. Chisholm emphasised that the reforms were developed in consultation with the disability community to address concerns about predatory practices and lack of accountability.