Opened the debate
Senator Ayres moved that the bill proceed without formalities and be read a first time. Ayres later moved that the motion be put. No substantive policy arguments were presented in the transcript provided.
Bill Debate · First Reading
Home Affairs Legislation Amendment (2025 Measures No. 1) Bill 2025; First Reading
Senate · Tuesday 2 September 2025
Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia
At a glance
The debate concerned the procedural motion to allow the bill to proceed without formalities. Senator Shoebridge opposed the motion, arguing it bypassed natural justice and silenced community voices regarding asylum seeker rights. Senator Ayres moved the motion and later moved for it to be put. The Greens sought to divide the question to speak on the procedural aspect but ultimately withdrew the request, rejecting the idea of proceeding without formalities.
Outcome
The transcript does not state the final result of the vote.
Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.
How the debate unfolded
-
Senator Shoebridge argued that the bill stripped asylum seekers of natural justice rights, including the right to be heard before deportation to Nauru. Shoebridge criticised the committee inquiry for refusing to hear witnesses from the refugee sector or legal advocates, claiming this silenced community voices. Shoebridge also referenced the government's previous Nauru agreement, noting that details were released with minimal public communication. Shoebridge withdrew the request to divide the question but maintained opposition to proceeding without formalities.