Opened the debate
Watt moved the second reading of the bill, explaining that it addressed inconsistencies in the Offshore Electricity Infrastructure licensing scheme. Watt stated that previous regulatory amendments only applied to applications made after their commencement, creating unfair outcomes for earlier applicants. The bill ensured that the amendments applied retrospectively to all feasibility licence applications, regardless of submission date. Watt argued this provided regulatory certainty, improved scheme administration, and supported the development of a high-integrity offshore renewables industry.