Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Electricity Infrastructure Legislation Amendment Bill 2025; Second Reading

Senate · Thursday 13 February 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The Senate debated the Electricity Infrastructure Legislation Amendment Bill 2025, which sought to apply regulatory amendments retrospectively to ensure consistent treatment of offshore electricity infrastructure licence applications. The government argued the bill provided regulatory certainty and supported the offshore renewables industry. The opposition opposed the bill, linking it to broader concerns about energy prices, grid reliability, and the government's climate agenda. The Greens supported the bill, highlighting an amendment that enshrined the Capacity Investment Scheme into law to protect renewable energy targets. The Nationals criticised the legislation as a rushed fix for administrative errors. The bill passed after divisions.

Outcome

The bill passed after divisions, with Division 16 not passed (30-34) and Division 17 passed (37-30).

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Watt moved the second reading of the bill, explaining that it addressed inconsistencies in the Offshore Electricity Infrastructure licensing scheme. Watt stated that previous regulatory amendments only applied to applications made after their commencement, creating unfair outcomes for earlier applicants. The bill ensured that the amendments applied retrospectively to all feasibility licence applications, regardless of submission date. Watt argued this provided regulatory certainty, improved scheme administration, and supported the development of a high-integrity offshore renewables industry.

Opposition response

Duniam opposed the bill, characterising it as part of a deal between the Labor government and the Greens. Duniam argued the legislation did nothing to address the cost-of-living crisis or rising energy prices, noting that households were paying significantly more than promised. Duniam claimed the bill reflected a green ideology that harmed jobs and grid reliability, particularly in manufacturing sectors like aluminium smelting. Duniam asserted that the government's exclusion of other energy technologies and failure to consult industry would lead to economic damage and job losses.

Votes during this debate

Division 16: Electricity Infrastructure Legislation Amendment Bill 2025; Second Reading Not passed 30–34 Division 17: Electricity Infrastructure Legislation Amendment Bill 2025; Second Reading Passed 37–30