Question Time AU

General Debate

Tertiary Education and Training

House of Representatives · Monday 14 September 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The House debated a motion acknowledging National TAFE Day and celebrating the contributions of TAFE staff and students. Labor members highlighted the success of the Free TAFE initiative, citing high enrolment numbers and the permanent legislative guarantee of 100,000 places annually from 2027. Coalition and National Party members criticised the program, arguing that apprenticeship numbers have declined significantly since 2022 and that the policy fails to address skills shortages or ensure job outcomes. The debate concluded with the motion being supported by Labor members, while opposition members called for a greater focus on employer needs and international best practices in vocational training.

Outcome

The debate was adjourned.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Phillips moved the motion to mark National TAFE Day and honour the work of TAFE educators, personnel, and learners. Phillips stated that government funding for Free TAFE has eliminated cost obstacles, enabling more Australians to acquire skills in key sectors. Phillips noted that more than 850,000 free TAFE spots have been provided, with high uptake in care, construction, technology, and early childhood education. Phillips stressed that Free TAFE is now a lasting part of the national vocational education and training framework, with laws ensuring at least 100,000 places annually from 2027, supported by over $1.6 billion in funding until 2034-35.

Opposition response

Birrell argued that the quality of vocational education and its alignment with employer needs must be improved. Birrell noted that the number of apprentices and trainees has fallen from 426,830 in 2022 to around 282,000, indicating a failure in the current system. Birrell suggested that the government's approach of making courses free without ensuring completion or job outcomes is insufficient. Birrell proposed looking to international models, such as Germany's joint apprenticeship system, where businesses and chambers of commerce help set the curriculum to ensure practical relevance.