Question Time AU

General Debate

Cheaper Home Batteries Program

House of Representatives · Monday 7 September 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The House of Representatives debated a motion commending the government on the first year of the Cheaper Home Batteries Program. Labor members highlighted that over 500,000 batteries had been installed, reducing household bills and supporting grid reliability as coal plants close. The Shadow Minister for Energy and Emissions Reduction called for an immediate audit, citing safety concerns and a budget forecast increase from $2 billion to $8 billion. Independent members supported the program's success but urged the government to extend benefits to renters and apartment dwellers through plug-in solar legality and landlord incentives.

Outcome

The motion was agreed to.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Cook moved the motion to commend the government on the program, noting that installations had surpassed 500,000 since the launch on 1 July 2026. Cook argued that the 30 per cent discount was delivering real cost-of-living relief, with many households saving $1,000 or more annually. Cook emphasised that the majority of installations were in outer suburban and regional areas, contradicting claims that the scheme only benefited wealthy inner-city residents. Cook stated that the batteries were helping to moderate evening peak prices and support grid security as coal-fired power stations withdrew.

Opposition response

Tehan called for an immediate audit of the program, arguing that the rollout had been rushed and lacked proper safety checks. Tehan noted that the program's cost had risen from an initial estimate of $2 billion to $8 billion in budget forecasts, requiring the Clean Energy Regulator to provide funding when departmental funds were exhausted. Tehan questioned the independence of the Smart Energy Council, which conducts safety checks, due to its political donations to the Labor Party. Tehan warned that without systemic checks and balances, the program could result in significant costs for households and taxpayers.