Question Time AU

General Debate

Employment

House of Representatives · Monday 22 June 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on a motion moved by the Australian Labor Party regarding the dignity of work and proposed reforms to employment services. Labor members argued that the current one-size-fits-all system is outdated and requires significant overhaul to better support diverse jobseekers, alongside advocating for fair wage increases. Opposition members criticised the government's economic management, arguing that inflation is eroding wage gains and that the reforms lack evidence of improving long-term employment outcomes. Centre Alliance highlighted specific barriers in sectors like aged care and trucking, calling for more intensive investment in skills training.

Outcome

The motion was debated as part of private members' business; the transcript does not state the final vote result.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Abdo moved the motion, arguing that the dignity of work is a foundational value and that the current employment services system, designed three decades ago, is failing to deliver sustainable outcomes. Abdo noted that around one in six people exit Workforce Australia only to return within a year, indicating a focus on compliance rather than genuine employment. Abdo outlined the government's plan to replace the existing model with three new service streams tailored to individual needs, backed by substantial investment. Abdo also emphasised the government's advocacy for economically sustainable real wage increases for minimum wage and award-reliant workers.

Opposition response

Small argued that the success of employment reforms should be judged by long-term job retention rather than announcements, noting that 670,000 Australians remain unemployed. Small highlighted that the number of people receiving JobSeeker and similar payments had risen by more than 70,000 in one year, suggesting the system is not effectively moving people off welfare. Small contended that government spending and inflation are undermining private sector prosperity and the capacity to create jobs. Small stated that the Coalition would not support the motion as it focused on intentions rather than assessing actual performance in matching jobseekers with available roles.