Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Universities Accord (Australian Tertiary Education Commission) Bill 2025; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Thursday 5 February 2026

Continued from Wednesday 26 November 2025.

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Kate Chaney spoke on the bill, supporting the principle of an Australian Tertiary Education Commission but opposing the legislation as drafted. She argued the bill failed to grant the commission necessary independence, authority, or capability, risking it becoming a rebranded departmental branch. Chaney outlined specific amendments to increase commissioner numbers, ensure operational autonomy, and expand the commission's remit to include research and student costs. She stated she would likely oppose the bill if these essential changes were not accepted.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Continued the debate

Chaney supported the establishment of an Australian Tertiary Education Commission in principle, citing the need for long-term stewardship and evidence-based planning in tertiary education. However, she opposed the bill as drafted, arguing it did not provide the independence or authority recommended by the Universities Accord. Chaney contended the proposed body risked becoming dependent bureaucracy constrained by ministerial request rather than acting as an independent steward. Chaney highlighted past policy failures, such as the Job-Ready Graduates scheme, as evidence of the need for robust, non-partisan oversight. Chaney stated she would move amendments to fix these defects and would likely withhold support if the government refused them.