Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Criminal Code Amendment (State Sponsors of Terrorism) Bill 2025; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Wednesday 8 October 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The Attorney-General introduced legislation to amend the Criminal Code, creating a framework to list foreign state entities as state sponsors of terrorism. The bill was presented as a necessary response to recent antisemitic attacks in Australia attributed to Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. It proposes new criminal offences and powers for law enforcement to address threats from state actors. The debate was adjourned after the opening speech, with no other members speaking.

Outcome

The debate was adjourned.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Rowland argued that the bill was essential to protect national security against evolving threats from malicious foreign actors. Rowland stated that existing laws did not adequately address terrorism directed by state entities, necessitating a new legislative framework. The Attorney-General emphasized that the legislation would allow for the listing of foreign state entities involved in terrorist acts targeting Australia. Rowland highlighted that the bill included appropriate safeguards and defences for legitimate interactions with listed entities. Rowland urged the parliament to support the measure to maintain social cohesion and safety.

Government response

Rowland explained that the bill introduces Part 5.3A to the Criminal Code to specifically target state-sponsored terrorism. Rowland noted that the framework allows for the criminalisation of engaging in, preparing for, or supporting state terrorist acts. The Attorney-General confirmed that law enforcement and intelligence agencies would gain powers equivalent to those used against non-state terrorist organisations. Rowland acknowledged the collaborative effort with state and territory governments to ensure the legislation was robust and balanced. Rowland concluded by commending the bill to the House as a firm response to emerging security challenges.