Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Telecommunications and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Tuesday 7 October 2025

Continued from Wednesday 27 August 2025.

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate concerned technical amendments to telecommunications interception laws, surveillance devices, and controlled operations to address technological changes and machinery-of-government shifts. All speakers supported the bill, citing the need for law enforcement to combat online child exploitation, cybercrime, and national security threats. Key issues included transferring the Communications Access Coordinator role to Home Affairs, allowing access to stored communications for testing, and clarifying international data sharing agreements. The bill was passed without amendment.

Outcome

The bill was read a second time and passed without amendment.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Continued the debate

Leeser argued the bill provides essential clarifications for law enforcement and intelligence agencies operating in a rapidly changing technological environment. Leeser stated that Schedule 1 allows network activity warrant information to be used for disclosure obligations and evidence, while Schedule 2 transfers the Communications Access Coordinator role to Home Affairs following the portfolio's reconstitution. Leeser explained that Schedule 3 permits limited access to stored communications for testing, and Schedule 4 fixes technical issues with international production orders under the Australia-US data access agreement. Leeser highlighted that Schedule 5 clarifies thresholds for controlled operations and protects officers investigating sexual abuse syndicates, noting 82,764 reports of online child sexual exploitation in 2024-25. Leeser concluded that the coalition supports the bill without amendment to ensure agencies have necessary tools.

Government response

Clutterham commended the bill for making technical amendments to keep pace with evolving cyber threats and technological developments. Clutterham explained that Schedule 1 enables disclosure of network activity warrant information to ensure fair trials and defensible prosecutions, subject to strict safeguards. Clutterham noted that Schedule 2 reflects post-election machinery-of-government changes by moving the Communications Access Coordinator function to Home Affairs. Clutterham detailed how Schedule 3 allows agencies to access stored communications for testing purposes only, as these are now indistinguishable from live communications. Clutterham stated that Schedule 4 makes international production orders technology-neutral, facilitating data access from US providers. Clutterham emphasised that Schedule 5 strengthens safeguards for controlled operations and provides legal protections for officers tackling online child exploitation, citing a 45 per cent increase in reports in 2023-24.