Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Telecommunications and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Wednesday 27 August 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate concerned the Telecommunications and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2025, which sought to update electronic surveillance and law enforcement frameworks. Tony Burke moved the second reading, arguing the bill provided necessary technical clarifications for agencies to operate effectively amidst rapid technological change. The legislation addressed disclosure duties, regulatory transfers, testing authorisations, international orders, and controlled operation safeguards. No other members spoke, and the debate was adjourned without a recorded vote in the transcript.

Outcome

The debate was adjourned.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Burke argued that the bill was essential for updating surveillance frameworks to meet new geopolitical and technological challenges. Burke stated that Schedule 1 would clarify the Commonwealth's duty of disclosure regarding network activity warrants to ensure defensible prosecutions. Burke explained that Schedule 2 transferred the Communications Access Coordinator role to the Department of Home Affairs to align with machinery-of-government changes. Burke noted that Schedule 3 allowed access to stored communications during technology testing, while Schedule 4 clarified international production orders. Burke also highlighted that Schedule 5 strengthened safeguards for controlled operations, particularly in investigating online child exploitation, citing a 45 per cent increase in reports in 2023-24.

Government response

Burke moved the second reading of the bill, outlining its five schedules. Burke emphasised that the changes were technical but vital for ensuring law enforcement agencies could keep pace with technological advancements in criminal activity. Burke detailed how the amendments would clarify disclosure obligations, transfer regulatory roles, enable technology testing, secure international data access, and strengthen safeguards for controlled operations. Burke concluded by commending the bill to the House and acknowledging the work of security agency personnel.