Commonwealth Workplace Protection Orders Bill 2025; Second Reading

Clutterham argued the bill protects the dignity and safety of frontline workers who face abuse and intimidation. Clutterham cited data showing nearly 1,700 serious incidents at Services Australia in 2023-2024, alongside thousands of other aggression reports. The legislation allows courts to issue orders while ensuring vulnerable people can still access services through alternative arrangements. Clutterham emphasised that the bill balances worker safety with the need to maintain accessible government services for those in crisis.

Doyle stated the bill responds to the Ashton review, triggered by a serious assault on a Services Australia team leader in 2023. Doyle noted that 1,694 serious incidents occurred in 2023-2024, highlighting a trend of aggression against Commonwealth staff. The legislation closes a gap by allowing authorised persons to apply for orders, protecting worker privacy and reducing the burden on victims. Doyle outlined that orders can cover various workplaces, including remote work settings, and breach penalties include up to two years imprisonment.

Campbell highlighted that Services Australia staff face over four serious incidents daily, necessitating immediate action. Campbell explained the bill implements recommendation 17 of the Ashton review, adopting ACT provisions for nationwide use. The scheme allows applications via phone or electronic means in urgent cases and covers workers in diverse roles, including cleaners and security guards. Campbell noted that orders do not prevent access to essential services, requiring applicants to propose alternative arrangements if conditions limit access.

Ng, a former public servant, argued the bill protects essential workers who deal with vulnerable populations in difficult circumstances. Ng cited 1,694 serious incidents in 2023-2024 and an assault on Border Force contractors in May 2025 as evidence of the risk. The legislation allows the Commonwealth to apply for orders, shielding workers from the trauma of personal legal proceedings. Ng contrasted this support with previous Coalition policies he claimed undermined the public service, asserting the bill demonstrates respect for workers.