Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Free TAFE Bill 2024; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Tuesday 4 February 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate centred on legislation to make fee-free TAFE places permanent, funding 100,000 spots annually from 2027. Government members argued the bill addresses critical skills shortages in construction, healthcare, and education while providing cost-of-living relief. The opposition shadow minister opposed the bill, citing high costs, low completion rates, and logistical barriers for regional apprentices. Government speakers highlighted record enrolments and specific benefits for disadvantaged groups, while the opposition warned of financial waste and inequity.

Outcome

The debate was interrupted before a vote was recorded.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Emma McBride (Dobell) (Australian Labor Party) ALP

McBride supported the bill, stating it cements 100,000 free TAFE courses annually to address workforce shortages in sectors like aged care and construction. McBride highlighted that nearly 600,000 enrolments had occurred in less than two years, demonstrating strong demand for upskilling. McBride argued the policy removes financial barriers for students, particularly in regional areas, and cited personal anecdotes of constituents benefiting from the program. McBride contrasted the current government's investment with previous Liberal administrations, which she claimed neglected vocational education.

Government response

Kristy McBain (Minister for Regional Development, Local Government and Territories) ALP Eden-Monaro

McBain supported the bill, noting its importance for regional communities where one-third of free TAFE places are located. McBain argued the legislation targets industries with workforce shortfalls, including construction and the care economy, to support economic growth. McBain highlighted additional government measures, such as wiping $3 billion in student debt and providing $10,000 incentives for construction apprentices. McBain criticised the opposition for previously cutting funding from the vocational education and training system.

Opposition response

Pat Conaghan (Shadow Assistant Minister for Social Services; Shadow Assistant Minister for the Prevention of Family Violence) Nationals Cowper

Conaghan opposed the bill, arguing it was not costed and would cost taxpayers half a billion dollars annually. Conaghan cited a case study of a regional business forced to cover training costs due to TAFE NSW capacity issues, requiring apprentices to travel long distances. Conaghan claimed apprenticeship numbers had fallen under the current government and that the bill was inequitable as it did not cover all courses. Conaghan advocated for incentivising employers rather than subsidising students, referencing previous coalition policies.