Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Firearms Legislation Amendment (Repealing Unfair Gun Laws) Bill 2026; Second Reading

Senate · Thursday 13 August 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate concerned the introduction of legislation to repeal recent firearm restrictions and the National Gun Buyback Scheme introduced following the Bondi Beach attack. The National Party argued that the previous measures were unjust, lacked evidence, and unfairly targeted law-abiding owners without addressing the root causes of terrorism. The speaker highlighted the economic impact on dealers and the lack of state cooperation for the buyback scheme. The bill aims to restore firearm laws to their pre-January 2026 status while retaining enhanced background checks.

Outcome

The debate was adjourned after leave was granted for McKenzie to continue her remarks later.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Bridget McKenzie (VIC) (National Party) Nationals

McKenzie moved the second reading of the bill, arguing it corrected an injustice inflicted on nearly one million law-abiding firearm owners. McKenzie contended that the previous legislation was rushed, lacked consultation, and was not based on evidence relevant to the Bondi Beach attack. McKenzie stated that the bill would repeal the National Gun Buyback Scheme and import restrictions but would retain enhanced background checks involving national security information. McKenzie emphasised that the previous laws penalised lawful owners while failing to address the actual causes of the terrorist attack.