Question Time AU

Bill Debate · First Reading

Firearms Legislation Amendment (Repealing Unfair Gun Laws) Bill 2026; First Reading

House of Representatives · Monday 7 September 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate concerned the introduction of a bill to repeal recent amendments to firearms legislation, which members argued were politically motivated responses to the Bondi tragedy rather than effective safety measures. Speakers contended that existing laws were already stringent and that the new measures unfairly targeted law-abiding gun owners, including farmers and sporting shooters, without addressing the root causes of extremism. They highlighted practical issues such as restrictions on importing sporting equipment, penalties for accessing repair information online, and the high cost of the proposed buyback scheme. The opposition argued that resources would be better spent on healthcare and infrastructure, and that the legislation failed to adequately compensate owners or address the specific needs of pest control. The motion for the first reading was supported by the National Party and the Liberal National Party.

Outcome

The bill was introduced for its first reading.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Littleproud moved the bill, arguing it corrected a wrong caused by political expedience following the Bondi tragedy. Littleproud asserted that Australia already possessed the world's strongest gun laws, including fit-and-proper-person tests and mandatory training, which rendered further restrictions unnecessary. Littleproud claimed the new laws persecuted over a million lawful gun owners, including farmers and recreational shooters who assist with pest mitigation, without improving safety. Littleproud criticised specific provisions, such as penalties for downloading repair instructions via carriage services and bans on importing sporting vests, as disproportionate and ineffective. Littleproud argued the government failed to address Islamic extremism, which he identified as the true security threat, and noted that only New South Wales and the ACT had signed up to the federal buyback scheme.