Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Protecting Australians from Foreign Terrorist Fighters Bill 2026; Second Reading

Senate · Wednesday 12 August 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Pauline Hanson introduced legislation aimed at strengthening Australia's ability to prevent the return of individuals who joined foreign terrorist organisations. The bill proposes new exclusion orders, stricter bail conditions for terrorism charges, and expanded powers to cancel passports. Hanson argued that the current government had failed to protect national security by allowing returns without adequate safeguards. She contended that the proposed measures were necessary to address gaps in existing law and ensure community safety.

Outcome

Debate was adjourned with leave granted for Hanson to continue remarks later.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Pauline Hanson (QLD) (Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party) One Nation

Hanson argued that the government had failed to prioritise national security, citing the return of women linked to Islamic State. Hanson claimed that ministers had met with lobbyists seeking the return of these individuals and had issued permits despite initial security objections. Hanson stated that the bill would empower the Federal Court to issue exclusion orders, suspend return permits, and impose stricter bail conditions. Hanson emphasised that the legislation included safeguards, such as judicial oversight and limits on ministerial power, to address constitutional concerns.