Protecting Australians from Foreign Terrorist Fighters Bill 2026

Stage by Stage

Summaries in reported speech - not a transcript. In date order, both chambers.

1. Wednesday 12 August 2026 · Senate

   First Reading
   See who spoke

2. Wednesday 12 August 2026 · Senate

   Second Reading

   Pauline Hanson introduced legislation aimed at strengthening Australia's ability to prevent the return of individuals who joined foreign terrorist organisations. The bill proposes new exclusion orders, stricter bail conditions for terrorism charges, and expanded powers to cancel passports. Hanson argued that the current government had failed to protect national security by allowing returns without adequate safeguards. She contended that the proposed measures were necessary to address gaps in existing law and ensure community safety.

   Outcome: Debate was adjourned with leave granted for Hanson to continue remarks later.

   Read the full summary

3. Thursday 10 September 2026 · Senate

   Second Reading

   The debate centred on whether the bill provided necessary legal tools to prevent the return of individuals linked to Islamic State, or whether it was unconstitutional and procedurally flawed. One Nation and the Liberal Party supported the legislation, arguing that the government had failed to protect national security by allowing returns despite claiming no assistance was provided. The Australian Greens and an independent senator opposed the bill, citing constitutional risks, vague definitions, and a lack of proper scrutiny. The bill was ultimately defeated in the Senate.

   Outcome: The bill was not passed, with 21 senators voting against it and 32 voting in favour.

   Read the full summary