Question Time AU

Bill Debate · In Committee

Social Security and Other Legislation Amendment (Technical Changes No. 1) Bill 2026; In Committee

Senate · Thursday 26 March 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Senator Penny Allman-Payne moved three amendments to the bill during committee stage. The first sought to remove the $200 upper limit on urgent payment requests, arguing the cap was inadequate given rising costs. The second proposed indexing this limit to inflation. The third aimed to introduce a six-year statute of limitations on debt recovery across several social security acts. Minister Katy Gallagher opposed all amendments, stating the bill focused on legal compliance rather than payment adequacy or policy changes. She noted that debt recovery reforms were under separate consultation. The amendments were not supported by the government.

Outcome

The amendments moved by Senator Allman-Payne were not supported by the government and were effectively defeated as the minister indicated opposition to all changes.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Senator Allman-Payne moved an amendment to remove the $200 upper limit on urgent payment requests, citing submissions from ACOSS and Economic Justice Australia that the cap was arbitrary and insufficient for essential needs like rental bonds or appliances. Allman-Payne argued that with many recipients having minimal savings, the limit failed to address urgent financial crises. Allman-Payne questioned why the government maintained this cap despite evidence that costs for essentials often exceeded $200.

Government response

Minister Gallagher stated the government would not support the amendment, clarifying that the bill’s purpose was to ensure the lawful authority for urgent payments, not to alter payment settings. Gallagher noted the $200 limit had been in place for some time and was not the subject of this legislation. Gallagher directed questions about payment adequacy to the budget process, highlighting recent increases to JobSeeker and rent assistance as evidence of government support.