Question Time AU

Take Note Debate

Fuel Security, Waste Management and Recycling, Cybersafety, Fuel

Senate · Thursday 26 March 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Senators from the Australian Greens criticised the government for failing to legislate a digital duty of care and for adopting a passive stance on international affairs. They argued that the government had neglected to implement privacy reforms comparable to European standards, leaving Australians vulnerable to data exploitation by major technology platforms. The debate also addressed concerns regarding fuel security and the government's alignment with United States foreign policy in the Middle East. The motion to take note of the answers was agreed to without further amendment.

Outcome

The motion to take note of the answers was agreed to.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Shoebridge argued that the government had failed to move from rhetoric to legislation regarding a digital duty of care. Shoebridge contended that both the current Labor government and the previous Coalition administration had allowed major technology platforms unrestricted access to Australian user data. Shoebridge advocated for adopting European regulatory frameworks that enforce algorithmic transparency and give users the right to opt out of data collection. Shoebridge cited the scraping of Australian social media content by Meta as evidence of inadequate privacy protections. Shoebridge also criticised the government's foreign policy stance, suggesting it lacked independence in its dealings with the United States.