Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Prime Agricultural Land Protection Bill 2026; Second Reading

Senate · Wednesday 11 March 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Senator Matthew Canavan moved the second reading of the Prime Agricultural Land Protection Bill 2026, arguing that national food security requires strict protection of prime agricultural land from development and foreign control. The proposed legislation would establish a national mapping system categorising land into three tiers, with the highest tier receiving absolute protection from Commonwealth-funded projects that reduce productivity or involve foreign ownership. Canavan contended that the bill ensures developers meet rigorous conditions regarding land rehabilitation and social licence, supported by a new independent Agriculture Commissioner. The debate was adjourned after Canavan sought leave to continue his remarks at a later time.

Outcome

The debate was adjourned after Senator Canavan sought leave to continue his remarks later.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Canavan argued that the bill addresses the critical issue of shrinking prime agricultural land by establishing a national mapping system to categorise farmland into three tiers. Canavan stated that Tier 1 land would be protected from any Commonwealth-funded projects that reduce farming productivity or allow foreign-controlled corporations to gain ownership. For Tier 2 and Tier 3 land, Canavan explained that development would only proceed if proponents met strict conditions, including providing financial bonds for land rehabilitation and securing genuine social licence from local communities. Canavan emphasised that the legislation creates an independent Agriculture Commissioner to oversee these processes and resolve disputes fairly, ensuring farmers are not displaced without adequate support. Canavan maintained that the bill prioritises long-term national food security over short-term political agendas and does not oppose development but rather ensures it respects agricultural viability.