Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Prime Agricultural Land Protection Bill 2026; Second Reading

House of Representatives · Monday 2 March 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The debate focused on the Prime Agricultural Land Protection Bill 2026, introduced by the National Party to safeguard Australia's most productive farming areas. The member for Lyne argued that current development pressures, including mining and renewable energy projects, threaten food security and regional livelihoods without adequate protection for landowners. The proposed legislation seeks to establish a national mapping system for agricultural land and impose strict conditions on Commonwealth-funded projects affecting prime farmland. It aims to prevent the loss of high-quality soil and ensure that farmers are compensated and supported if their land is impacted. The bill was moved for second reading to initiate the legislative process.

Outcome

The bill was moved for second reading by Alison Penfold.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Alison Penfold (Lyne) (National Party) Nationals

Penfold argued that the bill was necessary to protect prime agricultural land from being sacrificed for political agendas or poorly planned development. Penfold highlighted specific concerns regarding mineral carbonation projects in her electorate and transmission line expansions that disrupt farming operations. The member stated that once high-quality soil is lost, it cannot be easily replaced, making protection essential for national food security. Penfold emphasized that the legislation would not block development but would require proponents to prove that land and communities are respected. Penfold asserted that the bill aligns with global best practices and prioritizes the interests of regional Australia.