Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Commonwealth Electoral Amendment (Banning Dirty Donations) Bill 2026; Second Reading

Senate · Wednesday 4 February 2026

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

Senator Steph Hodgins-May moved the second reading of the bill, which aims to ban political donations from specific industries and cap individual contributions. The legislation targets sectors including fossil fuels, banking, defence, pharmaceuticals, liquor, tobacco, and gambling, arguing that their donations compromise democratic integrity. Hodgins-May cited evidence of corporate influence on policy outcomes and low public trust in parliament. The debate was adjourned after the senator sought leave to continue remarks later.

Outcome

The debate was adjourned after the senator sought leave to continue remarks later.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Hodgins-May supported the bill as a necessary measure to remove corporate influence from politics and restore democratic integrity. The senator argued that previous electoral reforms were insufficient because they maintained high disclosure thresholds and failed to restrict donations from harmful industries. Hodgins-May contended that transparency alone has not curbed the corrupting influence of money in politics, necessitating direct bans and caps. The bill proposes limiting individual donations to $3,000 per election term to prevent wealthy entities from buying influence. Hodgins-May emphasized that the legislation aligns with recommendations from the Senate Select Committee into the Political Influence of Donations.