Question Time AU

Bill Debate · Second Reading

Environment Information Australia Bill 2025, Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (Customs Charges Imposition) Bill 2025, Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (Excise Charges Imposition) Bill 2025, Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (General Charges Imposition) Bill 2025, Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (Restoration Charge Imposition) Bill 2025, Environment Protection Reform Bill 2025, National Environmental Protection Agency Bill 2025; Second Reading

Senate · Monday 24 November 2025

Official Hansard for this day (APH) · Read this debate on OpenAustralia

At a glance

The Senate debated a suite of bills aimed at reforming Australia's environmental laws, centred on the Environment Protection Reform Bill 2025 and the National Environmental Protection Agency Bill 2025. The legislation seeks to address findings from the 2020 Samuel Review by strengthening environmental protections, improving decision-making efficiency, and enhancing transparency through an independent regulator. The government argued that current laws are ineffective for both conservation and economic development, proposing measures such as national environmental standards, net gain offsets, and streamlined approval pathways. The debate concluded with the second reading of the bills being moved by the Minister for the Environment.

Outcome

The second reading of the bills was moved by Katy Gallagher.

Summary in reported speech - not a transcript. AI-generated, so check the official record before quoting.

How the debate unfolded

Opened the debate

Gallagher argued that the existing environmental laws were broken and failing to protect nature or facilitate necessary economic projects. Gallagher stated that the bill package responds to the 2020 Samuel Review by establishing national environmental standards with a no-regression clause and introducing a net gain principle for offsets. Gallagher highlighted the creation of an independent National Environmental Protection Agency to improve accountability and transparency in decision-making. Gallagher noted that reforms would streamline assessments, reducing approval times by 20 days and potentially saving billions in economic costs. The member also emphasised the introduction of stricter penalties for breaches and the codification of First Nations engagement through an Indigenous Advisory Committee.